Duréndez-Sáez Elena, Azkárate Aitor, Meri Marina, Calabuig-Fariñas Silvia, Aguilar-Gallardo Cristóbal, Blasco Ana, Jantus-Lewintre Eloisa, Camps Carlos
Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(Suppl 13):S1332-S1345. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.112.
Lung cancer is the second most frequent tumor and the leading cause of death by cancer in both men and women. Increasing knowledge about the cancer genome and tumor environment has led to a new setting in which morphological and molecular characterization is needed to treat patients in the most personalized way in order to achieve better outcomes. Since tumor products can be detected in body fluids, the liquid biopsy, particularly, peripheral blood, has emerged as a new source for lung cancer biomarker's analysis. A variety of tumor components can be used for this purpose. Among them, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) should be especially considered. Different detection methods for both CTCs and ctDNA have been and are being developed to improve the sensitivity and specificity of these tests. This would lead to better characterization and would solve some clinical doubts at different disease evolution times, e.g., intratumoral or temporal heterogeneity, difficulty in the obtaining a tumor sample, etc., and would also avoid the side effects of very expensive and complicated tumor obtaining interventions. CTCs and ctDNA are useful in different lung cancer settings. Their value has been shown for the early diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of treatment efficacy, monitoring responses and early detection of lung cancer relapse. CTCs have still not been validated for use in clinical settings in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while ctDNA has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medical Association (EMA), and the main clinical guidelines used for detect different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and the monitoring and treatment choice of mutated patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This review, describes how ctDNA seem to be winning the race against CTCs from the laboratory bench to clinical practice due to easier obtaining methods, manipulation and its implementation into clinical practice.
肺癌是第二常见的肿瘤,也是男性和女性癌症死亡的主要原因。对癌症基因组和肿瘤环境的了解不断增加,催生了一种新的局面,即需要进行形态学和分子特征分析,以便以最个性化的方式治疗患者,从而取得更好的治疗效果。由于肿瘤产物可在体液中检测到,液体活检,尤其是外周血,已成为肺癌生物标志物分析的新来源。多种肿瘤成分可用于此目的。其中,循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)和循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)应特别予以考虑。针对CTC和ctDNA的不同检测方法已经并正在开发,以提高这些检测的灵敏度和特异性。这将带来更好的特征描述,并解决不同疾病发展阶段的一些临床疑问,例如肿瘤内或时间上的异质性、获取肿瘤样本的困难等,还将避免非常昂贵和复杂的肿瘤获取干预措施的副作用。CTC和ctDNA在不同的肺癌情况下都很有用。它们在肺癌的早期诊断、预后、治疗疗效预测、反应监测和复发早期检测方面的价值已得到证实。CTC在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床应用中尚未得到验证,而ctDNA已获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲医学协会(EMA)的批准,并且是用于检测不同表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变以及监测和选择酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)突变患者治疗的主要临床指南。本综述描述了由于获取方法更简便、操作更容易及其在临床实践中的应用,ctDNA似乎正在从实验室走向临床实践的过程中胜过CTC。