• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病研究中准备队列开发的伦理问题。

Ethical Issues in the Development of Readiness Cohorts in Alzheimer's Disease Research.

机构信息

Richard Milne, PhD, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, 2 Wort's Causeway Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN,

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2017;4(2):125-131. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2017.5.

DOI:10.14283/jpad.2017.5
PMID:29186282
Abstract

There is growing interest in the development of novel approaches to secondary prevention trials in Alzheimer's disease to facilitate screening and recruitment of research participants and to reduce the time and costs associated with clinical trials. Several international research collaborations are setting up research infrastructures that link existing research cohorts, studies or patient registries to establish 'trial-ready' or 'readiness' cohorts. From these cohorts, individuals are recruited into clinical trial platforms. In setting up such research infrastructures, researchers must make ethically challenging design decisions in at least three areas: re-contacting participants in existing research studies, obtaining informed consent for participation in a readiness cohort, and disclosure of Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers. These ethical considerations have been examined by a dedicated workgroup within the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) project, a trans-European longitudinal cohort and adaptive proof-of-concept clinical trial platform. This paper offers recommendations for the ethical management of re-contact, informed consent and risk disclosure which may be of value to other research collaborations in the process of developing readiness cohorts for prevention trials in Alzheimer's disease and other disease areas.

摘要

人们越来越关注开发阿尔茨海默病二级预防试验的新方法,以促进研究参与者的筛选和招募,并降低临床试验相关的时间和成本。几个国际研究合作正在建立研究基础设施,将现有的研究队列、研究或患者登记处联系起来,建立“试验就绪”或“准备就绪”队列。从这些队列中招募个体进入临床试验平台。在建立这种研究基础设施时,研究人员必须在至少三个方面做出具有挑战性的伦理设计决策:重新联系现有研究中的参与者,获得参与准备队列的知情同意,以及披露与阿尔茨海默病相关的生物标志物。欧洲预防阿尔茨海默病痴呆症 (EPAD) 项目的一个专门工作组对这些伦理考虑进行了研究,该项目是一个跨欧洲纵向队列和适应性概念验证临床试验平台。本文提出了重新联系、知情同意和风险披露的伦理管理建议,这对于其他正在为阿尔茨海默病和其他疾病领域的预防试验开发准备队列的研究合作可能具有价值。

相似文献

1
Ethical Issues in the Development of Readiness Cohorts in Alzheimer's Disease Research.阿尔茨海默病研究中准备队列开发的伦理问题。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2017;4(2):125-131. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2017.5.
2
European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia Longitudinal Cohort Study (EPAD LCS): study protocol.欧洲预防阿尔茨海默病纵向队列研究(EPAD LCS):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;8(12):e021017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021017.
3
The European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) Longitudinal Cohort Study: Baseline Data Release V500.0.欧洲预防阿尔茨海默病(EPAD)纵向队列研究:基线数据版本 500.0 发布。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2020;7(1):8-13. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2019.46.
4
European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia Registry: Recruitment and prescreening approach for a longitudinal cohort and prevention trials.欧洲预防阿尔茨海默病登记处:纵向队列和预防试验的招募和预筛选方法。
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Jun;14(6):837-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
Development of interventions for the secondary prevention of Alzheimer's dementia: the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) project.阿尔茨海默病痴呆二级预防干预措施的开发:欧洲预防阿尔茨海默病痴呆(EPAD)项目
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;3(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00454-X. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
6
Prescreening for European Prevention of Alzheimer Dementia (EPAD) trial-ready cohort: impact of AD risk factors and recruitment settings.欧洲预防阿尔茨海默病(EPAD)试验预备队列的预筛选:AD 风险因素和招募环境的影响。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Jan 6;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0576-y.
7
Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.队列内试验的伦理与实践:一种新兴的实用试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/1740774517746620. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
8
The practice of obtaining approval from medical research ethics committees: a comparison within 12 European countries for a descriptive study on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's dementia.获得医学研究伦理委员会批准的做法:对12个欧洲国家关于阿尔茨海默病痴呆中乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂的描述性研究的比较。
Eur J Neurol. 2005 Mar;12(3):212-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00980.x.
9
Legal and ethical issues associated with patient recruitment in clinical trials: the case of competitive enrolment.临床试验中与患者招募相关的法律和伦理问题:竞争性入组案例
Health Law Rev. 2005;13(2-3):58-61.
10
Informed consent and clinical trials: where is the placebo effect?知情同意与临床试验:安慰剂效应何在?
BMJ. 2017 Feb 3;356:j463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j463.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical issues in genomics research in persons with Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease-related dementia (AD/ADRD): a systematic review.阿尔茨海默病/阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)患者中基因组学研究的伦理问题:系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 25;25(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01141-w.
2
The PREVENT dementia programme: baseline demographic, lifestyle, imaging and cognitive data from a midlife cohort study investigating risk factors for dementia.预防痴呆症项目:一项中年队列研究的基线人口统计学、生活方式、影像学和认知数据,该研究调查痴呆症的风险因素。
Brain Commun. 2024 May 31;6(3):fcae189. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae189. eCollection 2024.
3
The usage of population and disease registries as pre-screening tools for clinical trials, a systematic review.
将人群和疾病登记作为临床试验预筛选工具的应用:一项系统评价
Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 23;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02533-0.
4
Disclosing Individual Results in Dementia Research: A Proposed Study Participant's Bill of Rights.披露痴呆症研究中的个体结果:研究参与者权利法案草案。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;90(3):945-952. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220810.
5
Communicating and Using Dementia Risk Evidence.沟通和使用痴呆风险证据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;90(3):933-944. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220722.
6
Early-stage Alzheimer disease: getting trial-ready.早期阿尔茨海默病:做好试验准备。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2022 Jul;18(7):389-399. doi: 10.1038/s41582-022-00645-6. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Experiences of Participation in a Multimodal Preventive Trial MIND-AD Among Persons with Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease: A Qualitative Study.参与前驱期阿尔茨海默病患者多模式预防性试验MIND-AD的经历:一项定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Jan 29;15:219-234. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S345607. eCollection 2022.
8
Primary Prevention of Dementia: An Ethical Review.痴呆的一级预防:伦理审查。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(2):467-476. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201104.
9
The Framing of "Alzheimer's Disease": Differences Between Scientific and Lay Literature and Their Ethical Implications.“阿尔茨海默病”的构建:科学文献与大众文献的差异及其伦理意义。
Gerontologist. 2021 Jul 13;61(5):746-755. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa113.
10
Towards early disease modification of Parkinson's disease: a review of lessons learned in the Alzheimer field.帕金森病的早期疾病修饰:阿尔茨海默病领域的经验教训综述。
J Neurol. 2021 Feb;268(2):724-733. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10162-5. Epub 2020 Aug 18.