Richards Stephanie L, Balanay Jo Anne G, White Avian V, Hope Joe, Vandock Kurt, Byrd Brian D, Reiskind Michael H
East Carolina University, Department of Health Education and Promotion, Environmental Health Science Program, Greenville, NC.
Bayer Crop Science, Environmental Science/Vector Control and Pest Management, Research Triangle Park, NC.
J Med Entomol. 2018 Feb 28;55(2):398-407. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjx198.
Mosquitoes exposed to sublethal doses of insecticides may be selected for resistance to insecticide active ingredients (AIs). Mosquitoes are exposed to AIs through agricultural, public/private mosquito control programs, homeowners, and other sources. Hence, mosquito control programs should routinely measure the resistance/susceptibility status of mosquito populations of public health concern. The objectives here were to determine resistance status for six AIs used in adult mosquito control in the United States to assess how resistance/susceptibility differs between AI, mosquito species (states where > 1 species collected), and between years (some populations sampled for 2 yr). Field-collected eggs from 21 mosquito populations of six different species or hybrid species (Aedes albopictus Skuse [Diptera: Culicidae], Aedes aegypti L. [Diptera: Culicidae], Culex nigripalpus Theobald, Culex pipiens L. [Diptera: Culicidae], Culex quinquefasciatus Say [Diptera: Culicidae], Cx. pipiens/quinquefasciatus) were obtained. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention bottle bioassays were used to assess the resistance/susceptibility status for six AIs (bifenthrin, deltamethrin, etofenprox, malathion, permethrin, and phenothrin). World Health Organization guidelines were used to classify mosquitoes as susceptible (98-100% mortality at diagnostic time [DT]), possibly resistant (80-97% mortality at DT), or resistant (<80% mortality at DT). Significant differences were observed in mosquito susceptibility/resistance between species and AIs. In states where both Aedes and Culex were collected, the odds of exhibiting resistance in Culex were 68-69 times higher than Aedes (Texas odds ratio: 69.30; 95% confidence interval: 5.86, 819.44; P = 0.001; North Carolina odds ratio: 67.99; 95% confidence interval: 15.21, 303.94; P < 0.0001). Some level of resistance was detected against all tested AIs in several mosquito populations and some varied between 2015 and 2016.
接触亚致死剂量杀虫剂的蚊子可能会被选择出对杀虫剂活性成分(AI)产生抗性。蚊子通过农业、公共/私人蚊虫控制项目、房主及其他来源接触到AI。因此,蚊虫控制项目应定期测量具有公共卫生意义的蚊子种群的抗性/敏感性状况。此处的目标是确定美国用于成蚊控制的六种AI的抗性状况,以评估抗性/敏感性在AI、蚊子种类(采集到>1种蚊子的州)以及年份之间(部分种群采样2年)是如何不同的。从六个不同种类或杂交种类(白纹伊蚊Skuse [双翅目:蚊科]、埃及伊蚊L. [双翅目:蚊科]、致倦库蚊Theobald、尖音库蚊L. [双翅目:蚊科]、致倦库蚊Say [双翅目:蚊科])的21个蚊子种群中获取野外采集的蚊卵。使用疾病控制与预防中心的瓶式生物测定法评估六种AI(联苯菊酯、溴氰菊酯、醚菊酯、马拉硫磷、氯菊酯和苯醚菊酯)的抗性/敏感性状况。采用世界卫生组织的指南将蚊子分类为敏感(诊断时间[DT]时死亡率为98 - 100%)、可能抗性(DT时死亡率为80 - 97%)或抗性(DT时死亡率<80%)。在蚊子的敏感性/抗性方面,在种类和AI之间观察到显著差异。在同时采集到伊蚊和库蚊的州,库蚊表现出抗性的几率比伊蚊高68 - 69倍(得克萨斯州优势比:69.30;95%置信区间:5.86,819.44;P = 0.001;北卡罗来纳州优势比:67.99;95%置信区间:15.21,303.94;P < 0.0001)。在几个蚊子种群中检测到对所有测试AI都有一定程度的抗性,并且在2015年至2016年期间有些抗性有所变化。