Cardoso Clarissa S, von Keyserlingk Marina A G, Hötzel Maria José
Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada e Bem-Estar Animal, Departamento de Zootecnia e Desenvolvimento Rural, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034-001, Brazil.
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Animals (Basel). 2017 Nov 26;7(12):89. doi: 10.3390/ani7120089.
The primary aim of this study was to explore attitudes of urban Brazilian citizens about dairy production. A secondary aim was to determine their knowledge and attitudes about four potentially contentious routine dairy cattle management practices: early cow-calf separation; zero-grazing; culling of newborn male calves; and dehorning without pain mitigation. To address the first aim 40 participants were interviewed using open-ended semi-structured questions designed to probe their views and attitudes about dairy production in Brazil, and 300 participants answered a questionnaire that included an open-ended question about the welfare of dairy cattle. Primary concerns reported by the participants centered on milk quality, which included the rejection of any chemical additives, but also animal welfare, environmental and social issues. The interviewees rarely mentioned animal welfare directly but, when probed, expressed several concerns related to this topic. In particular, participants commented on factors that they perceived to influence milk quality, such as good animal health, feeding, clean facilities, and the need to avoid or reduce the use of drugs, hormones and pesticides, the avoidance of pain, frustration and suffering, and the ability of the animals to perform natural behaviors. To address our second aim, participants were asked questions about the four routine management practices. Although they self-reported being largely unaware of these practices, the majority of the participants rejected these practices outright. These data provide insight that animal welfare may be an important issue for members of the public. Failure to consider this information may increase the risk that certain dairy production practices may not be socially sustainable once lay citizens become aware of them.
本研究的主要目的是探究巴西城市居民对乳制品生产的态度。次要目的是确定他们对四种可能存在争议的奶牛常规管理做法的了解和态度:早期母牛与小牛分离;零放牧;新生雄性小牛的淘汰;以及在不减轻疼痛的情况下进行去角。为实现第一个目标,使用开放式半结构化问题对40名参与者进行了访谈,这些问题旨在探究他们对巴西乳制品生产的看法和态度,300名参与者回答了一份问卷,其中包括一个关于奶牛福利的开放式问题。参与者报告的主要关注点集中在牛奶质量上,这包括拒绝任何化学添加剂,也包括动物福利、环境和社会问题。受访者很少直接提及动物福利,但在被追问时,表达了与该主题相关的一些担忧。特别是,参与者评论了他们认为会影响牛奶质量的因素,如良好的动物健康状况、饲养、清洁的设施,以及避免或减少使用药物、激素和杀虫剂的必要性,避免疼痛、沮丧和痛苦,以及动物表现自然行为的能力。为实现我们的第二个目标,向参与者询问了关于这四种常规管理做法的问题。尽管他们自我报告基本上不了解这些做法,但大多数参与者直接拒绝了这些做法。这些数据提供了这样的见解,即动物福利可能是公众关注的一个重要问题。一旦普通公民意识到某些乳制品生产做法,不考虑这些信息可能会增加这些做法在社会上不可持续的风险。