金色开放获取：两全其美。
Gold open access: the best of both worlds.
作者信息
van der Heyden M A G, van Veen T A B
机构信息
Department of Medical Physiology, DH&L, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Neth Heart J. 2018 Jan;26(1):3-4. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1064-2.
Abstract
Gold open access provides free distribution of trustworthy scientific knowledge for everyone. As publication modus, it has to withstand the bad reputation of predatory journals and overcome the preconceptions of those who believe that open access is synonymous with poor quality articles and high costs. Gold open access has a bright future and will serve the scientific community, clinicians without academic affiliations and the general public.
摘要
金色开放获取为每个人提供了可信赖的科学知识的免费传播。作为一种出版模式，它必须抵御掠夺性期刊的不良声誉，并克服那些认为开放获取等同于低质量文章和高成本的人的先入之见。金色开放获取有着光明的未来，并将服务于科学界、无学术背景的临床医生和普通公众。
相似文献
1
Gold open access: the best of both worlds.金色开放获取：两全其美。
Neth Heart J. 2018 Jan;26(1):3-4. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1064-2.
2
Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology.掠夺性出版还是缺乏同行评审透明度？-小儿泌尿外科索引开放和非开放获取文章的当代分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Apr;15(2):159.e1-159.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.019. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取：文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
4
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
6
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.潜在的掠夺性和正规生物医学期刊：你能区分出来吗？一项横断面比较。
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 16;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.
7
[Predatory journals: how their publishers operate and how to avoid them].[掠夺性期刊：其出版商的运作方式以及如何避开它们]
Vnitr Lek. 2017 Winter;63(1):5-13.
8
Awareness of "Predatory" Open-Access Journals among Prospective Veterinary and Medical Authors Attending Scientific Writing Workshops.参加科研写作工作坊的兽医和医学作者对“掠夺性”开放获取期刊的认知。
Front Vet Sci. 2015 Aug 13;2:22. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00022. eCollection 2015.
9
The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology.神经科学和神经病学领域掠夺性开放获取现象的激增。
Neuroscience. 2017 Jun 14;353:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
10
Correlation Between Cost of Publication and Journal Impact. Comprehensive Cross-sectional Study of Exclusively Open-Access Surgical Journals.出版物成本与期刊影响力的相关性。纯开放获取外科期刊的综合横断面研究。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jan-Feb;76(1):107-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.029. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
引用本文的文献
1
ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research.ENCORE：一种提高计算研究可重复性和透明度的实际实施方案。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 16;15(1):8117. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52446-8.
2
State of open science in cancer research.癌症研究中的开放科学现状。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Oct;26(10):2457-2465. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03468-7. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Association between the use of Sci-Hub and consultation of scientific journals by medical students from six Latin American countries: A secondary analysis.六个拉丁美洲国家医学生使用Sci-Hub与查阅科学期刊之间的关联：一项二次分析
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 5;9(8):e17868. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17868. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Examining linguistic shifts between preprints and publications.考察预印本和出版物之间的语言变化。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Feb 1;20(2):e3001470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001470. eCollection 2022 Feb.
本文引用的文献
1
Open access to journal articles in oncology: current situation and citation impact.肿瘤学期刊文章的开放获取：现状与引用影响。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2612-2617. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx398.
2
Predatory journals recruit fake editor.掠夺性期刊招募虚假编辑。
Nature. 2017 Mar 22;543(7646):481-483. doi: 10.1038/543481a.
3
Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.开放获取期刊和订阅期刊发表研究的质量评估：系统评价结果
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154217. eCollection 2016.
4
Open access to journal articles in dentistry: Prevalence and citation impact.牙科期刊文章的开放获取：流行程度与引文影响
J Dent. 2016 Apr;47:41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
5
Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact.开放获取期刊与订阅期刊：科学影响力比较。
BMC Med. 2012 Jul 17;10:73. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.
Zotero 插件