• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Aerosol bronchodilator delivery methods. Relative impact on pulmonary function and cost of respiratory care.

作者信息

Summer W, Elston R, Tharpe L, Nelson S, Haponik E F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Lousisiana State University Medical School, New Orleans 70112.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1989 Mar;149(3):618-23. doi: 10.1001/archinte.149.3.618.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.149.3.618
PMID:2919938
Abstract

Thirty-six acutely III, hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of obstructive airway disease and a greater than 10% increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s after administration of aerosolized bronchodilator were randomized to receive either metaproterenol sulfate delivered by updraft-compressor nebulization (UDN) or terbutaline sulfate delivered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer. Serial analyses of pulmonary function measurements were performed with the use of 95% confidence intervals for the percentage response ratios of MDI to UDN. The response to MDI was at least equivalent to that of UDN, and MDI use was associated with no prolongation of hospital stay. Equivalent bronchodilation was achieved with MDI therapy with a lower daily charge for therapy for each patient and less respiratory therapist time. In hospitalized bronchodilator-responsive patients with acute exacerbations of obstructive airway disease, the MDI/spacer combination is the preferred approach when the status of the patient allows its use.

摘要

相似文献

1
Aerosol bronchodilator delivery methods. Relative impact on pulmonary function and cost of respiratory care.
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Mar;149(3):618-23. doi: 10.1001/archinte.149.3.618.
2
Cost-benefit comparison of aerosol bronchodilator delivery methods in hospitalized patients.
Chest. 1987 Apr;91(4):614-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.4.614.
3
Comparison of a hand-held nebulizer with a metered dose inhaler-spacer combination in acute obstructive pulmonary disease.急性阻塞性肺疾病中手持雾化器与定量吸入器-储雾罐组合的比较。
Chest. 1991 Nov;100(5):1300-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.5.1300.
4
A comparison of two delivery methods for aerosolized metaproterenol sulfate.
J Asthma. 1986;23(6):297-301. doi: 10.3109/02770908609073176.
5
Terbutaline metered-dose inhalation vs metaproterenol by hand-held nebulization: a comparison in black inner-city COPD patients.特布他林定量吸入剂与异丙喘宁手持式雾化吸入对比:针对城市中心区黑人慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较
J Natl Med Assoc. 1988 Apr;80(4):393-6.
6
Response to bronchodilator drug administration by a new reservoir aerosol delivery system and a review of other auxiliary delivery systems.新型储库型气雾剂给药系统对支气管扩张剂给药的反应及其他辅助给药系统综述
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Oct;126(4):670-5. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.4.670.
7
Nebuhaler versus wet aerosol for domiciliary bronchodilator therapy. A multi-centre clinical comparison.用于家庭支气管扩张剂治疗的干粉吸入器与湿雾化器:多中心临床比较
Med J Aust. 1992 Jun 1;156(11):771-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb121559.x.
8
Aerosolized metaproterenol in the treatment of asthmatics with severe airflow obstruction. Comparison of two delivery methods.雾化异丙喘宁治疗严重气流阻塞的哮喘患者。两种给药方法的比较。
Chest. 1989 May;95(5):1017-20. doi: 10.1378/chest.95.5.1017.
9
Terbutaline aerosol from a metered dose inhaler with a 750-ml spacer or as a nebulized solution. Comparison of two delivery systems for bronchodilator aerosol.来自配有750毫升储雾罐的定量吸入器的特布他林气雾剂,或作为雾化溶液。两种支气管扩张剂气雾剂给药系统的比较。
Respiration. 1983 May-Jun;44(3):237-40. doi: 10.1159/000194554.
10
Improvement of inhaler efficacy by home-made spacer.自制储物罐对吸入器疗效的改善作用。
J Med Assoc Thai. 1993 Dec;76(12):693-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Replacing nebulizers by MDI-spacers for bronchodilator and inhaled corticosteroid administration: Impact on the utilization of hospital resources.用定量吸入器加储雾罐替代雾化器进行支气管扩张剂和吸入性糖皮质激素给药:对医院资源利用的影响。
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2014 Sep;1(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
2
Evaluation of Bronchodilator Use During Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation Inpatient Admissions.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期住院患者支气管扩张剂使用情况的评估
Hosp Pharm. 2019 Apr;54(2):112-118. doi: 10.1177/0018578718769569. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
Bronchodilators delivered by nebuliser versus pMDI with spacer or DPI for exacerbations of COPD.
通过雾化器与使用储雾罐的压力定量吸入器或干粉吸入器给药的支气管扩张剂用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 29;2016(8):CD011826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011826.pub2.
4
Inhaler Use in Hospitalized Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Asthma: Assessment of Wasted Doses.慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘住院患者吸入器的使用:浪费剂量的评估
Hosp Pharm. 2015 May;50(5):386-90. doi: 10.1310/hpj5005-386.
5
Holding chambers (spacers) versus nebulisers for beta-agonist treatment of acute asthma.用于急性哮喘β受体激动剂治疗的储雾罐( spacer)与雾化器对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 13;2013(9):CD000052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000052.pub3.
6
Safety of daily albuterol in infants with a history of bronchospasm: a multi-center placebo controlled trial.有支气管痉挛病史婴儿每日使用沙丁胺醇的安全性:一项多中心安慰剂对照试验。
Open Respir Med J. 2009 Jul 16;3:100-6. doi: 10.2174/1874306400903010100.
7
Duration of salmeterol-induced bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a prospective clinical study.沙美特罗诱导机械通气慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者支气管扩张的持续时间:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R140. doi: 10.1186/cc7117. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
8
Chest diseases: inhaled treatment of asthma.胸部疾病:哮喘的吸入治疗
West J Med. 1990 Jul;153(1):70.
9
Management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly : an appraisal of published evidence.老年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的管理:已发表证据的评估
Drugs Aging. 2007;24(4):303-24. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200724040-00004.
10
Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2003 Oct;25(2):151-63. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:25:2:151.