• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医学风险分层评分系统的开发:分步教程

Development of scoring system for risk stratification in clinical medicine: a step-by-step tutorial.

作者信息

Zhang Zhongheng, Zhang Haoyang, Khanal Mahesh Kumar

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China.

Division of Biostatistics, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2017 Nov;5(21):436. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.08.22.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2017.08.22
PMID:29201888
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5690964/
Abstract

Risk scores play an important role in clinical medicine. With advances in information technology and availability of electronic healthcare record, scoring systems of less commonly seen diseases and population can be developed. The aim of the article is to provide a tutorial on how to develop and validate risk scores based on a virtual dataset by using R software. The dataset we generated including numeric and categorical variables and firstly the numeric variables would be converted to factor variables according to cutoff points identified by the LOESS smoother. Then risk points of each variable, which are related to the coefficients in logistic regression, are assigned to each level of the converted factor variables and other categorical variables. Finally, the total score is calculated for each subject to represent the prediction of the outcome event probability. The original dataset is split into training and validation subsets. Discrimination and calibration are evaluated in the validation subset. R codes with explanations are presented in the main text.

摘要

风险评分在临床医学中发挥着重要作用。随着信息技术的进步和电子健康记录的可得性,可以开发针对罕见疾病和人群的评分系统。本文的目的是提供一个教程,介绍如何使用R软件基于虚拟数据集开发和验证风险评分。我们生成的数据集包括数值型和分类变量,首先,数值型变量将根据局部加权散点平滑法(LOESS)确定的截断点转换为因子变量。然后,将与逻辑回归系数相关的每个变量的风险点分配给转换后的因子变量和其他分类变量的每个水平。最后,为每个受试者计算总分,以代表对结局事件概率的预测。原始数据集被分为训练子集和验证子集。在验证子集中评估区分度和校准度。正文中给出了带有解释的R代码。

相似文献

1
Development of scoring system for risk stratification in clinical medicine: a step-by-step tutorial.临床医学风险分层评分系统的开发:分步教程
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Nov;5(21):436. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.08.22.
2
External validation of models and simple scoring systems to predict miscarriage in intrauterine pregnancies of uncertain viability.对模型和简单评分系统进行外部验证,以预测不明存活能力的宫内妊娠流产。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):2905-11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det342. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
3
Development and validation of a pre-scoring system for nonspecific low back pain among general population in Guangzhou: a cross-sectional study.广州市一般人群非特异性下腰痛预评分系统的建立与验证:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 12;19(1):1262. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7564-9.
4
Derivation and Validation of a Risk-Prediction Tool for Hypoglycemia in Hospitalized Adults With Diabetes: The Hypoglycemia During Hospitalization (HyDHo) Score.住院糖尿病成人低血糖风险预测工具的推导和验证:住院期间低血糖(HyDHo)评分。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Jun;43(4):278-282.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.08.061. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
5
Predicting the Risk of Readmission From Dehydration After Ileostomy Formation: The Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction Score.预测回肠造口术后脱水再入院的风险:回肠造口术后脱水再入院预测评分。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Dec;61(12):1410-1417. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001217.
6
Development of a novel score for the prediction of hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the use of electronic healthcare records with LASSO regression.开发一种预测严重脓毒症患者医院死亡率的新评分:利用电子健康记录结合套索回归分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 25;8(30):49637-49645. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17870.
7
Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Tool.小儿门诊麻醉中的围手术期呼吸不良事件:风险预测工具的开发与验证
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1578-85. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001216.
8
Development of a Simple Clinical Risk Score for Early Prediction of Severe Dengue in Adult Patients.成人患者严重登革热早期预测的简易临床风险评分的开发
PLoS One. 2016 May 3;11(5):e0154772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154772. eCollection 2016.
9
Mortality prediction after cardiac surgery: blood lactate is indispensible.心脏手术后的死亡率预测:血乳酸必不可少。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;61(8):708-17. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1324796. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
10
To develop a regional ICU mortality prediction model during the first 24 h of ICU admission utilizing MODS and NEMS with six other independent variables from the Critical Care Information System (CCIS) Ontario, Canada.利用 MODS 和 NEMS 并结合加拿大安大略省重症监护信息系统 (CCIS) 中的其他六个独立变量,开发一种 ICU 入住后前 24 小时的区域性 ICU 死亡率预测模型。
J Intensive Care. 2016 Feb 29;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0143-6. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Predicting Tubal Pregnancy Rupture Based on Nomogram.基于列线图的输卵管妊娠破裂临床预测模型的构建与验证
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Apr;75(Suppl 1):300-309. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-01980-y. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Identifying psychosocial predictors and developing a risk score for preterm birth among Kenyan pregnant women.识别肯尼亚孕妇早产的社会心理预测因素并制定风险评分。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07058-x.
3
Iterative random forest-based identification of a novel population with high risk of complications post non-cardiac surgery.基于迭代随机森林的方法识别非心脏手术后并发症风险较高的新型人群。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 5;14(1):26741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78482-4.
4
Prehospital Targeting of 1-Year Mortality in Acute Chest Pain by Cardiac Biomarkers.通过心脏生物标志物对急性胸痛患者1年死亡率进行院前靶向治疗。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 16;13(24):3681. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13243681.
5
Deep learning-powered 3D segmentation derives factors associated with lymphovascular invasion and prognosis in clinical T1 stage non-small cell lung cancer.深度学习驱动的三维分割可得出与临床T1期非小细胞肺癌的淋巴管侵犯及预后相关的因素。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15147. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15147. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Derivation and validation of a blood biomarker score for 2-day mortality prediction from prehospital care: a multicenter, cohort, EMS-based study.从院前急救中推导和验证用于预测 2 天死亡率的血液生物标志物评分:一项基于多中心、队列、EMS 的研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;18(6):1797-1806. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03268-x. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
7
A Clinical Prediction Rule for Thrombosis in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Step 1 Results of the Thromcco Study.危重症 COVID-19 患者血栓形成的临床预测规则:Thromcco 研究的第一步结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 4;12(4):1253. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041253.
8
A novel interpretable machine learning system to generate clinical risk scores: An application for predicting early mortality or unplanned readmission in a retrospective cohort study.一种用于生成临床风险评分的新型可解释机器学习系统:在一项回顾性队列研究中预测早期死亡率或非计划再入院的应用。
PLOS Digit Health. 2022 Jun 13;1(6):e0000062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000062. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Development and Validation of Coding Algorithms to Identify Patients with Incident Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in United States Healthcare Claims Data.美国医疗保健理赔数据中用于识别新发非小细胞肺癌患者的编码算法的开发与验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 12;15:73-89. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S389824. eCollection 2023.
10
Optimization of the preoperative requirements of blood units for the surgical treatment of extra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma: the TRANSAR score.优化用于腹部外软组织肉瘤手术治疗的血单位术前需求:TRANSAR 评分。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 4;20(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02839-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
2
External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges.利用电子健康记录或个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析的大数据集对临床预测模型进行外部验证:机遇与挑战
BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3140. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3140.
3
Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation.迈向更好的临床预测模型:开发的七个步骤及验证的ABCD法
Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 1;35(29):1925-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu207. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
4
Application of ggplot2 to Pharmacometric Graphics.ggplot2 在药代动力学图形中的应用。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2013 Oct 16;2(10):e79. doi: 10.1038/psp.2013.56.
5
A new severity of illness scale using a subset of Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation data elements shows comparable predictive accuracy.使用急性生理学与慢性健康评估数据元素子集的新疾病严重程度评分显示出可比的预测准确性。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1711-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a24fe.
6
Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review.评估基于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)的模型预测重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率:一项系统评价。
Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R161. doi: 10.1186/cc7160. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
7
Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2.预测英格兰和威尔士的心血管疾病风险:QRISK2的前瞻性推导与验证
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1475-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39609.449676.25. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
8
The Logistic Organ Dysfunction system. A new way to assess organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit. ICU Scoring Group.逻辑器官功能障碍系统。一种评估重症监护病房器官功能障碍的新方法。重症监护病房评分小组。
JAMA. 1996 Sep 11;276(10):802-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.10.802.
9
A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.基于一项欧洲/北美多中心研究的新型简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)。
JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957.
10
Cardiovascular disease risk profiles.心血管疾病风险概况。
Am Heart J. 1991 Jan;121(1 Pt 2):293-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-b.