Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, EURAC research, Bolzano, Italy.
Psychol Med. 2018 Aug;48(11):1872-1879. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003397. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
Psychotic episodes during exposure to very high or extreme altitude have been frequently reported in mountain literature, but not systematically analysed and acknowledged as a distinct clinical entity.
Episodes reported above 3500 m altitude with possible psychosis were collected from the lay literature and provide the basis for this observational study. Dimensional criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders were used for psychosis, and the Lake Louise Scoring criteria for acute mountain sickness and high-altitude cerebral oedema (HACE). Eighty-three of the episodes collected underwent a cluster analysis to identify similar groups. Ratings were done by two independent, trained researchers (κ values 0.6-1).FindingsCluster 1 included 51% (42/83) episodes without psychosis; cluster 2 22% (18/83) cases with psychosis, plus symptoms of HACE or mental status change from other origins; and cluster 3 28% (23/83) episodes with isolated psychosis. Possible risk factors of psychosis and associated somatic symptoms were analysed between the three clusters and revealed differences regarding the factors 'starvation' (χ2 test, p = 0.002), 'frostbite' (p = 0.024) and 'supplemental oxygen' (p = 0.046). Episodes with psychosis were reversible but associated with near accidents and accidents (p = 0.007, odds ratio 4.44).
Episodes of psychosis during exposure to high altitude are frequently reported, but have not been specifically examined or assigned to medical diagnoses. In addition to the risk of suffering from somatic mountain illnesses, climbers and workers at high altitude should be aware of the potential occurrence of psychotic episodes, the associated risks and respective coping strategies.
在登山文献中经常有报道称,在极高或极端海拔处暴露时会出现精神病发作,但并未对此进行系统分析和确认为一种独特的临床实体。
从非专业文献中收集了海拔 3500 米以上可能出现精神病的发作病例,为这项观察性研究提供了基础。使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》的维度标准来诊断精神病,以及急性高原病和高原脑水肿(HACE)的路易斯湖评分标准。收集到的 83 个发作病例进行了聚类分析,以确定相似的组。由两名独立的、受过训练的研究人员进行评分(κ 值为 0.6-1)。
聚类 1 包括 51%(42/83)无精神病发作的病例;聚类 2 包括 22%(18/83)有精神病发作、伴有 HACE 症状或其他来源的精神状态改变的病例;聚类 3 包括 28%(23/83)孤立性精神病发作的病例。分析了三个聚类之间精神病和相关躯体症状的可能危险因素,发现“饥饿”(卡方检验,p=0.002)、“冻伤”(p=0.024)和“补充氧气”(p=0.046)等因素存在差异。精神病发作是可逆的,但与近因事故和事故有关(p=0.007,优势比 4.44)。
在高海拔地区暴露时出现精神病发作的情况经常被报道,但尚未对此进行专门检查或归类为医疗诊断。除了患有躯体高原病的风险外,高海拔地区的登山者和工作人员还应意识到出现精神病发作的潜在风险、相关风险和相应的应对策略。