Thacher Ryan R, Hickernell Thomas R, Grosso Matthew J, Shah Roshan, Cooper Herbert J, Maniker Robert, Brown Anthony Robin, Geller Jeffrey
Center for Hip and Knee Replacement, Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 15;3(4):281-285. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.02.008. eCollection 2017 Dec.
Femoral nerve (FNB) and adductor canal blocks (ACB) are used in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but neither has been demonstrated to be clearly superior. Although dynamometer studies have shown ACBs spare perioperative quadriceps function when compared to FNBs, ACBs have been widely adopted in orthopaedic surgery without significant evidence that they decrease the risk of perioperative falls.
All patients who received single-shot FNB (129 patients) or ACB (150 patients) at our institution for unilateral primary TKA from April 2014 to September 2015 were retrospectively reviewed for perioperative falls or near-falls during physical therapy and inpatient care.
There were significantly more "near-falls" with documented episodes of knee buckling in the FNB group (17 vs 3, = .0004). These patients' first buckling episode occurred at an average of 21.1 hours postoperatively (standard deviation 5.83, range 13.83-41.15). There were no significant differences in pain scores between the 2 groups at any of the time periods measured; however, patients in the FNB group consumed significantly fewer opioids on postoperative day 1 than the ACB group (59 morphine equivalents vs 73, = .004).
A significantly higher rate of near-falls with knee buckling during in-hospital physical therapy was discovered in the FNB group. With increasing numbers of TKAs being performed on a "fast-track" discharge model, these results must be seriously considered, particularly in patients planning to go home the same day, to reduce the risk of postoperative falls. These data support the recent clinical data trend favoring ACB over FNB in orthopaedic surgery.
股神经阻滞(FNB)和收肌管阻滞(ACB)用于全膝关节置换术(TKA),但均未被证明明显更具优势。尽管测力计研究表明,与FNB相比,ACB可保留围手术期股四头肌功能,但ACB已在骨科手术中广泛应用,却没有充分证据表明其能降低围手术期跌倒风险。
回顾性分析2014年4月至2015年9月在本机构接受单次FNB(129例患者)或ACB(150例患者)进行单侧初次TKA的所有患者在物理治疗和住院护理期间的围手术期跌倒或险些跌倒情况。
FNB组记录到的膝关节屈曲发作导致的“险些跌倒”明显更多(17例 vs 3例,P = .0004)。这些患者首次屈曲发作平均发生在术后21.1小时(标准差5.83,范围13.83 - 41.15)。在任何测量时间段,两组间疼痛评分均无显著差异;然而,FNB组患者术后第1天的阿片类药物消耗量明显少于ACB组(59吗啡当量 vs 73,P = .004)。
FNB组在住院物理治疗期间因膝关节屈曲导致的险些跌倒发生率明显更高。随着越来越多的TKA采用“快速出院”模式,必须认真考虑这些结果,尤其是对于计划当天回家的患者,以降低术后跌倒风险。这些数据支持了近期骨科手术中临床数据倾向于ACB优于FNB的趋势。