Ramakers Geerte G J, Smulders Yvette E, van Zon Alice, Van Zanten Gijsbert A, Grolman Wilko, Stegeman Inge
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2017 Nov 28;17:10. doi: 10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y. eCollection 2017.
There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients' subjective experiences gain importance in today's healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlation between subjective (self-reported questionnaires) and objective (speech perception and localization) hearing test results in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Secondary, the correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests was compared between bilateral and unilateral CI patients.
Data for this study were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either unilateral ( = 19) or bilateral ( = 19) cochlear implantation. We used data gathered after one year of follow-up. We studied the correlation between objectively measured speech perception and localization skills on the one hand and related domains of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) on the other hand. We also compared these correlations between unilateral and bilateral CI users.
We found significant weak to moderate negative correlations between the subjective test results (speech domain of the SSQ and the advanced speech perception domain of the NCIQ) and the related objective speech perception in noise test results ( = -0.33 to -0.48). A significant moderate correlation was found between the subjective test results (spatial domain of the SSQ) and the related objective localization test results ( = 0.59). The correlations in the group of bilateral CI patients ( = -0.28 to -0.54) did not differ significantly from the correlations in the group of unilateral CI patients ( = 0.15 to -0.40).
Current objective tests do not fully reflect subjective everyday listening situations. This study elucidates the importance and necessity of questionnaires in the evaluation of cochlear implantation. Therefore, it is advised to evaluate both objective and subjective tests in CI patients on a regular basis.
This trial was registered on March 11, 2009 in the Dutch Trial Register. Trial registration number: NTR1722.
评估人工耳蜗植入后的听力表现有多种方法。标准评估通常仅包括客观听力测试,而在当今的医疗保健中,患者的主观体验变得越来越重要。本研究的目的是分析成年人工耳蜗(CI)使用者主观(自我报告问卷)和客观(言语感知和定位)听力测试结果之间的相关性。其次,比较双侧和单侧CI患者主观和客观听力测试之间的相关性。
本研究的数据作为一项多中心随机对照试验的一部分进行前瞻性收集。38名语后聋成年患者被随机分配接受单侧(n = 19)或双侧(n = 19)人工耳蜗植入。我们使用了随访一年后收集的数据。我们一方面研究了客观测量的言语感知和定位技能与言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)以及奈梅亨人工耳蜗问卷(NCIQ)的相关领域之间的相关性。我们还比较了单侧和双侧CI使用者之间的这些相关性。
我们发现主观测试结果(SSQ的言语领域和NCIQ的高级言语感知领域)与相关的客观噪声中言语感知测试结果之间存在显著的弱至中度负相关(r = -0.33至-0.48)。在主观测试结果(SSQ的空间领域)与相关的客观定位测试结果之间发现了显著的中度相关性(r = 0.59)。双侧CI患者组的相关性(r = -0.28至-0.54)与单侧CI患者组的相关性(r = 0.15至-0.40)没有显著差异。
目前的客观测试不能完全反映主观的日常听力情况。本研究阐明了问卷在人工耳蜗植入评估中的重要性和必要性。因此,建议定期对CI患者进行客观和主观测试评估。
本试验于2009年3月11日在荷兰试验注册中心注册。试验注册号:NTR1722。