Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05030, Korea.
Infection. 2018 Feb;46(1):113-117. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1108-y. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of toxin positivity and toxin gene load, and the relation between them in the broad spectrum of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) including colonization, significant diarrhea, and severe disease.
We included 2671 fecal samples submitted for CDI diagnosis and 180 samples from healthy individuals. The clinical spectrum was categorized as category I (toxigenic C. difficile positive without clinical CDI criteria), category II (mild CDI), and category III (severe CDI). Clinical parameters were compared based on toxin EIA and tcdB C values. C values of tcdB PCR for predicting toxin EIA positivity were assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
The median C values of tcdB PCR and toxin positivity were not significantly correlated with clinical spectrum of CDI (27.5, 28.2, and 26.1 for tcdB C and 55.0, 56.6, and 60.9% for toxin EIA positivity in category I, II, and III, respectively, P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the tcdB C values between toxin EIA-positive and -negative groups (P < 0.001). Optimal cutoff for the tcdB C value for estimating toxin EIA positivity was 26.3 with 79.3% sensitivity and 83.6% specificity with good area under the curves (AUC, 0.848).
The C values successfully predicted toxin EIA positivity and could be used as a surrogate for toxin EIA positivity in the diagnostic algorithm and routine analysis. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical significance of tcdB PCR C value in toxigenic C. difficile colonization and infection.
本研究旨在评估产毒阳性和毒素基因载量的临床意义,以及它们在广泛的艰难梭菌感染(CDI)中的关系,包括定植、显著腹泻和严重疾病。
我们纳入了 2671 份粪便样本用于 CDI 诊断和 180 份来自健康个体的样本。临床谱分为 I 类(产毒艰难梭菌阳性但无临床 CDI 标准)、II 类(轻度 CDI)和 III 类(重度 CDI)。根据毒素 EIA 和 tcdB C 值比较临床参数。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估 tcdB PCR 的 C 值预测毒素 EIA 阳性的能力。
tcdB PCR 和毒素阳性的中位数 C 值与 CDI 的临床谱无显著相关性(tcdB C 值分别为 27.5、28.2 和 26.1,毒素 EIA 阳性率分别为 55.0%、56.6%和 60.9%,在 I、II 和 III 类中,P>0.05)。毒素 EIA 阳性和阴性组之间的 tcdB C 值存在显著差异(P<0.001)。用于估计毒素 EIA 阳性的 tcdB C 值最佳截断值为 26.3,具有 79.3%的敏感性和 83.6%的特异性,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.848。
C 值成功预测了毒素 EIA 阳性,并可作为诊断算法和常规分析中毒素 EIA 阳性的替代指标。需要进一步研究以验证 tcdB PCR C 值在产毒艰难梭菌定植和感染中的临床意义。