Department of Cardiology & Cardiovascular Research Institute, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan 430060, China.
Masonic Medical Research Laboratory, Utica, NY 13501, USA.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;254:151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.113. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
Typical Brugada ECG pattern is the keystone in the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. However, the exact prevalence remains unclear, especially in Asia. The present study was designed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of spontaneous Brugada ECG pattern recorded at standard leads.
We searched the Medline, Embase and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for studies of the prevalence of Brugada ECG pattern, published between Jan 1, 2003, and September 1, 2016. Pooled prevalence of type 1 and type 2-3 Brugada ECG pattern were estimated in a random-effects model, and group prevalence data by the characteristic of studies. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the effect of each study on the overall prevalence.
Thirty-nine eligible studies involving 558,689 subjects were identified. Pooled prevalence of type 1 and 2-3 Brugada ECG pattern was 0.03% (95%CI, 0.01%-0.06%), and 0.42% (95%CI, 0.28%-0.59%), respectively. Regions, sample size, year of publication were the main source of heterogeneity. The prevalence of type 1 Brugada ECG pattern was higher in male, Asia, adult, patient, and fever subjects; but the relation between fever and type 2-3 Brugada ECG pattern was not significant. Sensitivity analysis showed that each study did not lonely affect the prevalence of type 1 and type 2-3 Brugada ECG pattern.
Brugada ECG pattern is not rare, especially preponderant in adult Asian males, and fever subjects. Clinical screening and further examination of Brugada syndrome in potential population need to be highlighted.
典型 Brugada 心电图模式是 Brugada 综合征诊断的关键。然而,确切的患病率仍不清楚,尤其是在亚洲。本研究旨在系统评估标准导联记录的自发性 Brugada 心电图模式的患病率。
我们检索了 Medline、Embase 和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)中 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 9 月 1 日期间发表的 Brugada 心电图模式患病率研究。采用随机效应模型估计 1 型和 2-3 型 Brugada 心电图模式的汇总患病率,并按研究特征对组患病率数据进行分析。进行荟萃回归分析以探讨异质性的潜在来源,并进行敏感性分析以评估每项研究对总体患病率的影响。
共纳入 39 项符合条件的研究,涉及 558689 例受试者。1 型和 2-3 型 Brugada 心电图模式的汇总患病率分别为 0.03%(95%CI,0.01%-0.06%)和 0.42%(95%CI,0.28%-0.59%)。地区、样本量、发表年份是异质性的主要来源。1 型 Brugada 心电图模式在男性、亚洲、成年、患者和发热受试者中的患病率较高;但发热与 2-3 型 Brugada 心电图模式之间的关系不显著。敏感性分析表明,每项研究都没有单独影响 1 型和 2-3 型 Brugada 心电图模式的患病率。
Brugada 心电图模式并不罕见,尤其是在成年亚洲男性和发热患者中更为常见。需要在潜在人群中对 Brugada 综合征进行临床筛查和进一步检查。