Yaparpalvi Ravindra, Garg Madhur K, Shen Jin, Bodner William R, Mynampati Dinesh K, Gafar Aleiya, Kuo Hsiang-Chi, Basavatia Amar K, Ohri Nitin, Hong Linda X, Kalnicki Shalom, Tome Wolfgang A
Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, NY , USA.
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1083):20170393. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170393. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
Several dose metrics in the categories-homogeneity, coverage, conformity and gradient have been proposed in literature for evaluating treatment plan quality. In this study, we applied these metrics to characterize and identify the plan quality metrics that would merit plan quality assessment in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) dose distributions.
Treatment plans of 90 lung SBRT patients, comprising 91 targets, treated in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Dose calculations were performed using anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) with heterogeneity correction. A literature review on published plan quality metrics in the categories-coverage, homogeneity, conformity and gradient was performed. For each patient, using dose-volume histogram data, plan quality metric values were quantified and analysed.
For the study, the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) defined plan quality metrics were: coverage (0.90 ± 0.08); homogeneity (1.27 ± 0.07); conformity (1.03 ± 0.07) and gradient (4.40 ± 0.80). Geometric conformity strongly correlated with conformity index (p < 0.0001). Gradient measures strongly correlated with target volume (p < 0.0001). The RTOG lung SBRT protocol advocated conformity guidelines for prescribed dose in all categories were met in ≥94% of cases. The proportion of total lung volume receiving doses of 20 Gy and 5 Gy (V and V) were mean 4.8% (±3.2) and 16.4% (±9.2), respectively.
Based on our study analyses, we recommend the following metrics as appropriate surrogates for establishing SBRT lung plan quality guidelines-coverage % (ICRU 62), conformity (CN or CI) and gradient (R). Furthermore, we strongly recommend that RTOG lung SBRT protocols adopt either CN or CI in place of prescription isodose to target volume ratio for conformity index evaluation. Advances in knowledge: Our study metrics are valuable tools for establishing lung SBRT plan quality guidelines.
文献中已提出了均匀性、覆盖率、适形度和梯度等类别中的几种剂量指标,用于评估治疗计划质量。在本研究中,我们应用这些指标来表征和识别在肺部立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)剂量分布中值得进行计划质量评估的计划质量指标。
回顾性分析了在我们机构接受治疗的90例肺部SBRT患者的治疗计划,共包括91个靶区。使用带有不均匀性校正的各向异性分析算法(AAA)进行剂量计算。对已发表的关于覆盖率、均匀性、适形度和梯度等类别中的计划质量指标进行了文献综述。对于每位患者,利用剂量体积直方图数据对计划质量指标值进行量化和分析。
对于本研究,放射肿瘤学组(RTOG)定义的计划质量指标为:覆盖率(0.90±0.08);均匀性(1.27±0.07);适形度(1.03±0.07)和梯度(4.40±0.80)。几何适形度与适形指数密切相关(p<0.0001)。梯度测量与靶体积密切相关(p<0.0001)。RTOG肺部SBRT方案所倡导的所有类别中规定剂量的适形度指南在≥94%的病例中得到满足。接受20 Gy和5 Gy剂量的全肺体积比例(V和V)分别平均为4.8%(±3.2)和16.4%(±9.2)。
基于我们的研究分析,我们推荐以下指标作为建立SBRT肺部计划质量指南的合适替代指标——覆盖率%(ICRU 62)、适形度(CN或CI)和梯度(R)。此外,我们强烈建议RTOG肺部SBRT方案采用CN或CI来替代处方等剂量线与靶体积之比进行适形指数评估。知识进展:我们研究中的指标是建立肺部SBRT计划质量指南的有价值工具。