Laboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
Colorado State University, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Mycobacteria Research Laboratories, Fort Collins, CO, Unites States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251631. eCollection 2021.
The number of new cases of leprosy reported worldwide has remained essentially unchanged for the last decade despite continued global use of free multidrug therapy (MDT) provided to any diagnosed leprosy patient. In order to more effectively interrupt the chain of transmission, new strategies will be required to detect those with latent disease who contribute to furthering transmission. To improve the ability to diagnose leprosy earlier in asymptomatic infected individuals, we examined the combined use of two well-known biomarkers of M. leprae infection, namely the presence of M. leprae DNA by PCR from earlobe slit skin smears (SSS) and positive antibody titers to the M. leprae-specific antigen, Phenolic Glycolipid I (anti-PGL-I) from leprosy patients and household contacts living in seven hyperendemic cities in the northern state of Pará, Brazilian Amazon. Combining both tests increased sensitivity, specificity and accuracy over either test alone. A total of 466 individuals were evaluated, including 87 newly diagnosed leprosy patients, 52 post-treated patients, 296 household contacts and 31 healthy endemic controls. The highest frequency of double positives (PGL-I+/RLEP+) were detected in the new case group (40/87, 46%) with lower numbers for treated (12/52, 23.1%), household contacts (46/296, 15.5%) and healthy endemic controls (0/31, 0%). The frequencies in these groups were reversed for double negatives (PGL-I-/RLEP-) for new cases (6/87, 6.9%), treated leprosy cases (15/52, 28.8%) and the highest in household contacts (108/296, 36.5%) and healthy endemic controls (24/31, 77.4%). The data strongly suggest that household contacts that are double positive have latent disease, are likely contributing to shedding and transmission of disease to their close contacts and are at the highest risk of progressing to clinical disease. Proposed strategies to reduce leprosy transmission in highly endemic areas may include chemoprophylactic treatment of this group of individuals to stop the spread of bacilli to eventually lower new case detection rates in these areas.
尽管全球范围内继续为任何确诊的麻风病患者提供免费的多药物治疗(MDT),但过去十年间全球新报告的麻风病病例数量基本保持不变。为了更有效地阻断传播链,需要新的策略来发现那些潜伏疾病的患者,这些患者会进一步传播疾病。为了提高在无症状感染个体中更早诊断麻风病的能力,我们研究了两种著名的麻风分枝杆菌感染生物标志物的联合使用,即耳郭裂皮拭子(SSS)中麻风分枝杆菌 DNA 的 PCR 检测(PCR-DNA)和麻风病患者及生活在巴西亚马逊州北部七个高度流行城市的家庭接触者中麻风病特异性抗原酚糖脂 I(抗-PGL-I)的阳性抗体滴度。两种检测方法联合使用可提高敏感性、特异性和准确性。共评估了 466 人,包括 87 例新诊断的麻风病患者、52 例已治疗的患者、296 例家庭接触者和 31 名健康的地方病对照者。在新病例组中检测到最高的双阳性率(PGL-I+/RLEP+)(40/87,46%),治疗组(12/52,23.1%)、家庭接触者组(46/296,15.5%)和健康地方病对照组(0/31,0%)的双阳性率较低。对于双阴性(PGL-I-/RLEP-),新病例组(6/87,6.9%)、治疗组(15/52,28.8%)和家庭接触者组(108/296,36.5%)的频率较高,而健康地方病对照组(24/31,77.4%)的频率较低。这些数据强烈表明,双阳性的家庭接触者患有潜伏性疾病,可能会导致疾病的传播和传播给他们的密切接触者,并且处于发展为临床疾病的最高风险之中。在高度流行地区减少麻风病传播的建议策略可能包括对这组人群进行化学预防治疗,以阻止细菌的传播,最终降低这些地区的新病例检出率。