Suppr超能文献

一项随机、双向交叉研究,旨在评估含咖啡因口香糖与市售含咖啡因饮料在健康成年志愿者中递送咖啡因的药代动力学。

A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

作者信息

Sadek Paul, Pan Xiao, Shepherd Phil, Malandain Elise, Carney John, Coleman Hugh

机构信息

Mars Wrigley Confectionery, Chicago, Illinois.

JMC Consulting, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

J Caffeine Res. 2017 Dec 1;7(4):125-132. doi: 10.1089/jcr.2017.0025.

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine delivered using caffeinated chewing gum to that delivered using a marketed caffeinated beverage (instant coffee) in 16 healthy adult volunteers. This was a controlled open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study. Caffeinated chewing gum and a serving of instant coffee, each containing ∼50 mg caffeine, were administered with blood samples collected before and up to 24 hours after administration starts. Plasma caffeine levels were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry methodology. There were no statistical differences between the two caffeine products in ( = 0.3308) and ( = 0.3894). Although formulated at ∼50 mg caffeine each, mean dose released from chewing gum was ∼18% less than beverage. Dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), AUC, and was similar between products. Although the criteria were not set a priori and the study was not powered for concluding bioequivalence, the 90% confidence intervals fell within the bioequivalence limit of 80% to 125%. Existing scientific literature on caffeine, based mostly on data from caffeinated beverages, can be leveraged to support the safety of caffeine delivered by chewing gum and current maximum safe caffeine dose advice should be applicable irrespective of delivery method.

摘要

本研究旨在比较含咖啡因口香糖与市售含咖啡因饮料(速溶咖啡)在16名健康成年志愿者体内咖啡因的药代动力学。这是一项对照开放标签、随机、两期交叉研究。含咖啡因口香糖和一份速溶咖啡,每份均含有约50毫克咖啡因,给药前及给药开始后长达24小时采集血样。采用经过验证的液相色谱-串联质谱法分析血浆咖啡因水平。两种咖啡因产品在[此处原文缺失相关指标](=0.3308)和[此处原文缺失相关指标](=0.3894)方面无统计学差异。尽管每种产品的咖啡因含量设定为约50毫克,但口香糖释放的平均剂量比饮料少约18%。产品之间剂量标准化的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)、AUC和[此处原文缺失相关指标]相似。尽管未预先设定标准且该研究未进行生物等效性结论的效能分析,但90%置信区间落在80%至125%的生物等效性限度内。现有的关于咖啡因的科学文献大多基于含咖啡因饮料的数据,可用于支持口香糖递送咖啡因的安全性,当前的最大安全咖啡因剂量建议应适用于任何递送方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c4f/5724581/b534578b7b97/fig-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验