• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

U.S. outlook issues: putting America's house in order.

作者信息

Brinner R E

机构信息

U.S. Economic Service, DRI/McGraw-Hill, Lexington, Massachusetts 02173.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1989 Mar;64(3):131-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198903000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-198903000-00005
PMID:2923634
Abstract

Despite the economic growth in 1987 and 1988, there are three issues of concern: the strength of consumer spending, the risk of accelerating inflation, and the federal budget deficit. The history of recent consumer spending is reviewed, and the recommendation made that if the recent "binge" of 1987-1988 has caused the economy to overshoot its production capacity, monetary and fiscal policies should be adjusted to rein in the spending. Regarding inflation, despite projected productivity gains, the economy seems to be heading for a 4.5%-5.0% core rate of inflation, a rate that can surge to 1970s-like levels with any substantial bad news. The observation is made that no major sustained cut in financing costs will occur until U.S. fiscal policy is changed. Regarding the deficit, voters cannot seek more services without either higher taxes or higher interest rates; growth alone will not cure the federal deficit. The distinction between good and bad types of debt is made and the history and causes of the $ 2 trillion increase in federal debt between fiscal years 1980 and 1988 is reviewed. Corporate debt and the recent corporate acquisitions and leveraged buyouts are analyzed. Public policy considerations arise primarily from the need to limit the system risks imposed by the scale of the buyout mania and to insure fair treatment of current debt holders of target corporations. Greater regulation of pension investments may be necessary, and widespread use of change-of-ownership clauses in bonds would be productive.

摘要

相似文献

1
U.S. outlook issues: putting America's house in order.
Acad Med. 1989 Mar;64(3):131-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198903000-00005.
2
America's emphasis on welfare: is it children's welfare or corporate welfare?美国对福利的重视:是儿童福利还是企业福利?
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2003 Jul-Sep;16(3):133-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2003.00133.x.
3
Intergenerational aspects of government policy under changing demographic and economic conditions.人口结构与经济状况变化下政府政策的代际因素
Bus Econ. 1987 Jul;22(3):18-24.
4
Is the United States in the middle of a healthcare bubble?美国是否正处于医疗保健泡沫之中?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):99-111. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0668-y. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
International Monetary Fund sacrifices higher growth, employment, spending, and public investment in health systems in order to keep inflation unnecessarily low.国际货币基金组织为了将通胀率维持在不必要的低水平,牺牲了更高的增长、就业、支出和公共卫生系统投资。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):333-8. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.n.
6
The effects of the COVID pandemic on the federal budget outlook.新冠疫情对联邦预算前景的影响。
Bus Econ. 2020;55(4):202-212. doi: 10.1057/s11369-020-00188-y. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Health care spending growth: can we avoid fiscal Armageddon?医疗保健支出增长:我们能否避免财政末日?
Inquiry. 2010;47(4):285-95. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_47.04.285.
8
Examining quality and efficiency of the U.S. healthcare system.审视美国医疗体系的质量与效率。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(5):366-88. doi: 10.1108/09526861111139197.
9
From Surplus to Deficit Fiscal Policy.从盈余财政政策到赤字财政政策。
Stud Russ Econ Dev. 2021;32(5):476-484. doi: 10.1134/S1075700721050026. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
10
Interaction between fiscal and monetary policy in a dynamic nonlinear model.动态非线性模型中财政政策与货币政策的相互作用
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0118917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118917. eCollection 2015.