Suppr超能文献

荷兰女性违背医疗建议选择高危分娩环境的动机:定性分析。

Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Brouwketel 4, 6681 GT Bemmel, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1621-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home births in high risk pregnancies and unassisted childbirth seem to be increasing in the Netherlands. Until now there were no qualitative data on women's motivations for these choices in the Dutch maternity care system where integrated midwifery care and home birth are regular options in low risk pregnancies. We aimed to examine women's motivations for birthing outside the system in order to provide medical professionals with insight and recommendations regarding their interactions with women who have birth wishes that go against medical advice.

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative research design with a constructivist approach and a grounded theory method were used. In-depth interviews were performed with 28 women on their motivations for going against medical advice in choosing a high risk childbirth setting. Open, axial and selective coding of the interview data was done in order to generate themes. A focus group was held for a member check of the findings.

RESULTS

Four main themes were found: 1) Discrepancy in the definition of superior knowledge, 2) Need for autonomy and trust in the birth process, 3) Conflict during negotiation of the birth plan, and 4) Search for different care. One overarching theme emerged that covered all other themes: Fear. This theme refers both to the participants' fear (of interventions and negative consequences of their choices) and to the providers' fear (of a bad outcome). Where for some women it was a positive choice, for the majority of women in this study the choice for a home birth in a high risk pregnancy or an unassisted childbirth was a negative one. Negative choices were due to previous or current negative experiences with maternity care and/or conflict surrounding the birth plan.

CONCLUSIONS

The main goal of working with women whose birthing choices do not align with medical advice should not be to coerce them into the framework of protocols and guidelines but to prevent negative choices. Recommendations for maternity caregivers can be summarized as: 1) Rethink risk discourse, 2) Respect a woman's trust in the birth process and her autonomous choice, 3) Have a flexible approach to negotiating the birth plan using the model of shared decision making, 4) Be aware of alternative delivery care providers and other sources of information used by women, and 5) Provide maternity care without spreading or using fear.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,高风险妊娠和无人协助的分娩似乎呈上升趋势。在荷兰的产妇护理系统中,提供整合的助产护理和家庭分娩是低风险妊娠的常规选择,但是目前还没有关于女性在这种情况下选择的动机的定性数据。我们旨在研究女性选择在系统外分娩的动机,以便为医疗专业人员提供有关与那些违背医疗建议的女性互动的见解和建议。

方法

采用探索性定性研究设计,构建主义方法和扎根理论方法。对 28 名女性进行深入访谈,了解她们在选择高风险分娩环境时违背医疗建议的动机。对访谈数据进行开放式、轴向和选择性编码,以生成主题。进行了焦点小组讨论,以验证研究结果。

结果

发现了四个主要主题:1)对卓越知识定义的差异;2)对分娩过程自主权和信任的需求;3)分娩计划谈判中的冲突;4)寻找不同的护理。一个涵盖所有其他主题的主题出现了:恐惧。这个主题既指参与者的恐惧(对干预和选择的负面后果的恐惧),也指提供者的恐惧(对不良结果的恐惧)。对于一些女性来说,这是一个积极的选择,但对于本研究中的大多数女性来说,在高风险妊娠或无人协助的分娩中选择家庭分娩是一个消极的选择。消极的选择是由于以前或当前对产妇护理的负面经历以及围绕分娩计划的冲突。

结论

与那些不符合医疗建议的分娩选择的女性合作的主要目标不应该是迫使她们遵守协议和指南,而是应该防止做出消极的选择。对产妇护理人员的建议可以概括为:1)重新思考风险话语;2)尊重女性对分娩过程的信任和自主选择;3)采用共享决策模型灵活处理分娩计划谈判;4)了解女性使用的替代分娩护理提供者和其他信息来源;5)提供产妇护理,不传播或使用恐惧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0683/5732454/8db4ab32ad32/12884_2017_1621_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验