Goodarzi Fereshte, Rahnama Leila, Karimi Noureddin, Baghi Raziyeh, Jaberzadeh Shapour
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Jan;41(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
This study aimed to compare neck extensor muscle thickness, thickness changes, and strength between participants with forward head posture (FHP) and controls with normal head posture (NHP).
Twenty college students with FHP (mean age 21.30 ± 2.36 years) and 20 students with NHP (mean age 21.85 ± 2.78 years) participated in this case-control study. The thickness of neck extensor muscles was measured at rest and at maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). In addition, the craniovertebral angle (CVA) was calculated. To compare thickness changes between the 2 groups and among 5 muscles, a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance was applied. In addition, Pearson's correlation test was performed to investigate the relationship between neck extensor MVIC and CVA.
The FHP group demonstrated lower MVIC compared with the NHP group (P = .03). Semispinalis capitis showed the smallest thickness changes during neck extensor MVIC in FHP compared with the controls (P < .001). However, no significant difference in terms of muscle thickness was observed between the 2 groups at the state of rest (P = .16-.99). A positive association was also found between the MVIC and CVA (P = .02).
Semispinalis capitis had less thickness changes during MVIC of neck extensors in individuals with FHP compared with those with NHP. This indirectly implies lower activity of this muscle in FHP condition. This study finding may help researchers develop therapeutic exercise protocols to manage FHP.
本研究旨在比较头前伸姿势(FHP)参与者与头姿势正常(NHP)的对照组之间颈部伸肌厚度、厚度变化及力量。
20名头前伸姿势的大学生(平均年龄21.30±2.36岁)和20名头姿势正常的学生(平均年龄21.85±2.78岁)参与了这项病例对照研究。在静息状态和最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)时测量颈部伸肌厚度。此外,计算颅椎角(CVA)。为比较两组之间以及5块肌肉之间的厚度变化,应用双向重复测量方差分析。此外,进行Pearson相关检验以研究颈部伸肌MVIC与CVA之间的关系。
与NHP组相比,FHP组的MVIC较低(P = .03)。与对照组相比,头半棘肌在FHP组颈部伸肌MVIC期间厚度变化最小(P < .001)。然而,两组在静息状态下的肌肉厚度无显著差异(P = .16 - .99)。MVIC与CVA之间也存在正相关(P = .02)。
与NHP个体相比,FHP个体的头半棘肌在颈部伸肌MVIC期间厚度变化较小。这间接表明该肌肉在FHP状态下的活动较低。本研究结果可能有助于研究人员制定治疗性运动方案来管理FHP。