Jori Ferran, Relun Anne, Trabucco Bastien, Charrier François, Maestrini Oscar, Chavernac David, Cornelis Daniel, Casabianca François, Etter Eric Marcel Charles
CIRAD, UMR Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risque et Ecosystèmes (ASTRE), Montpellier, France.
ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier, France.
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Dec 1;4:198. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00198. eCollection 2017.
Wild boars and domestic pigs belong to the same species (). When sympatric populations of wild boars, feral pigs, and domestic pigs share the same environment, interactions between domestic and wild suids (IDWS) are suspected to facilitate the spread and maintenance of several pig pathogens which can impact on public health and pig production. However, information on the nature and factors facilitating those IDWS are rarely described in the literature. In order to understand the occurrence, nature, and the factors facilitating IDWS, a total of 85 semi-structured interviews were implemented face to face among 25 strict farmers, 20 strict hunters, and 40 hunting farmers in the main traditional pig-farming regions of Corsica, where IDWS are suspected to be common and widespread. Different forms of IDWS were described: those linked with sexual attraction of wild boars by domestic sows (including sexual interactions and fights between wild and domestic boars) were most frequently reported (by 61 and 44% of the respondents, respectively) in the autumn months and early winter. Foraging around common food or water was equally frequent (reported by 60% of the respondents) but spread all along the year except in winter. Spatially, IDWS were more frequent in higher altitude pastures were pig herds remain unattended during summer and autumn months with limited human presence. Abandonment of carcasses and carcass offal in the forest were equally frequent and efficient form of IDWS reported by 70% of the respondents. Certain traditional practices already implemented by hunters and farmers had the potential to mitigate IDWS in the local context. This study provided quantitative evidence of the nature of different IDWS in the context of extensive commercial outdoor pig farming in Corsica and identified their spatial and temporal trends. The identification of those trends is useful to target suitable times and locations to develop further ecological investigations of IDWS at a finer scale in order to better understand diseases transmission patterns between populations and promote adapted management strategies.
野猪和家猪属于同一物种( )。当野猪、野猪化家猪和家猪的同域种群共享同一环境时,家猪与野猪之间的相互作用(IDWS)被怀疑会促进几种猪病原体的传播和维持,这些病原体可能会影响公共卫生和养猪生产。然而,文献中很少描述促进这些家猪与野猪相互作用的性质和因素。为了了解家猪与野猪相互作用的发生情况、性质以及促进因素,在科西嘉岛主要传统养猪地区,对25名严格的养殖户、20名严格的猎人以及40名兼业猎人进行了总共85次面对面的半结构化访谈,在这些地区家猪与野猪的相互作用被怀疑普遍且广泛存在。人们描述了不同形式的家猪与野猪相互作用:与家母猪对野猪的性吸引相关的相互作用(包括野猪与家猪之间的性互动和争斗)在秋季和初冬最为频繁地被报告(分别有61%和44%的受访者提及)。在常见食物或水源周围觅食的情况同样频繁(60%的受访者报告),但除冬季外全年都有发生。在空间上,家猪与野猪的相互作用在海拔较高的牧场更为频繁,在夏季和秋季猪群无人看管且人员在场有限。70%的受访者报告称,在森林中遗弃 carcasses 和 carcass 内脏是同样频繁且有效的家猪与野猪相互作用形式。猎人和养殖户已经实施的某些传统做法有可能在当地环境中减轻家猪与野猪的相互作用。本研究提供了在科西嘉岛广泛的商业户外养猪背景下不同家猪与野猪相互作用性质的定量证据,并确定了它们的时空趋势。识别这些趋势有助于确定合适的时间和地点,以便在更精细的尺度上对家猪与野猪的相互作用开展进一步的生态调查,从而更好地了解种群之间的疾病传播模式并推广适应性管理策略。 (注:原文中“carcasses”未翻译,可能是特定术语或拼写有误,若“carcasses”是“尸体”之意,可替换上述翻译中对应部分)