Pinheiro Juliana Barchelli, Vomero Marina Peris, do Nascimento Cássio, Watanabe Evandro, Paranhos Helena de Freitas Oliveira, Coto Neide Pena, Dias Reinaldo Brito, Oliveira Viviane Cássia de, Silva-Lovato Cláudia Helena
a Department of Dental Materials and Prostheses, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto , University of Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo , Brazil.
b Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto , University of Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo , Brazil.
Biofouling. 2018 Jan;34(1):15-25. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2017.1403591. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
This study investigated the microbial colonization of maxillofacial prostheses and support tissues using the Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method, and the efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, 10% Ricinus communis solutions, or brushing, on colony forming unit (CFU) reduction in monospecies biofilms (Candida glabrata, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) formed on two silicones (MDX 4-4210 and Bio-Skin). Biofilm was harvested from 43 maxillofacial prosthesis wearers for detection of 38 species of microorganisms. The CFU counts of the six above mentioned species were recorded after using the hygiene protocols. All 38 investigated species were identified in prostheses and tissues, with a higher prevalence in the prostheses. 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate immersion showed the greatest antimicrobial effectiveness, followed by mechanical brushing protocols. MDX 4-4210 silicone produced lower CFU counts than Bio-Skin.
本研究采用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交法调查了颌面修复体及支持组织的微生物定植情况,以及0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定、10%蓖麻溶液或刷牙对在两种硅酮材料(MDX 4-4210和生物皮肤)上形成的单菌种生物膜(光滑念珠菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、变形链球菌、大肠杆菌、粪肠球菌和铜绿假单胞菌)中菌落形成单位(CFU)减少的效果。从43名颌面修复体佩戴者处采集生物膜,以检测38种微生物。在采用卫生方案后,记录上述六种菌种的CFU计数。在修复体和组织中均鉴定出所有38种被调查的菌种,在修复体中的患病率更高。0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定浸泡显示出最大的抗菌效果,其次是机械刷牙方案。MDX 4-4210硅酮材料产生的CFU计数低于生物皮肤。