Suppr超能文献

证据不充分,表明增加 tDCS 的电流强度可提高疗效。

Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY 10031, USA; Biomedical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, University Federico II, Naples and IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome Italy.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):310-321. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is investigated to modulate neuronal function by applying a fixed low-intensity direct current to scalp.

OBJECTIVES

We critically discuss evidence for a monotonic response in effect size with increasing current intensity, with a specific focus on a question if increasing applied current enhance the efficacy of tDCS.

METHODS

We analyzed tDCS intensity does-response from different perspectives including biophysical modeling, animal modeling, human neurophysiology, neuroimaging and behavioral/clinical measures. Further, we discuss approaches to design dose-response trials.

RESULTS

Physical models predict electric field in the brain increases with applied tDCS intensity. Data from animal studies are lacking since a range of relevant low-intensities is rarely tested. Results from imaging studies are ambiguous while human neurophysiology, including using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a probe, suggests a complex state-dependent non-monotonic dose response. The diffusivity of brain current flow produced by conventional tDCS montages complicates this analysis, with relatively few studies on focal High Definition (HD)-tDCS. In behavioral and clinical trials, only a limited range of intensities (1-2 mA), and typically just one intensity, are conventionally tested; moreover, outcomes are subject brain-state dependent. Measurements and models of current flow show that for the same applied current, substantial differences in brain current occur across individuals. Trials are thus subject to inter-individual differences that complicate consideration of population-level dose response.

CONCLUSION

The presence or absence of simple dose response does not impact how efficacious a given tDCS dose is for a given indication. Understanding dose-response in human applications of tDCS is needed for protocol optimization including individualized dose to reduce outcome variability, which requires intelligent design of dose-response studies.

摘要

背景

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)通过在头皮上施加固定的低强度直流电来调节神经元功能。

目的

我们批判性地讨论了效应大小随电流强度增加呈单调响应的证据,特别关注一个问题,即增加施加的电流是否会增强 tDCS 的疗效。

方法

我们从不同角度分析了 tDCS 强度与反应的关系,包括生物物理建模、动物模型、人类神经生理学、神经影像学和行为/临床测量。此外,我们还讨论了设计剂量反应试验的方法。

结果

物理模型预测大脑中的电场随施加的 tDCS 强度增加而增加。由于很少测试相关的低强度范围,因此缺乏动物研究数据。成像研究的结果模棱两可,而人类神经生理学,包括使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)作为探针,表明存在复杂的状态依赖非单调剂量反应。常规 tDCS 组合产生的脑电流弥散性使这种分析变得复杂,而针对聚焦的高清晰度(HD)-tDCS 的研究相对较少。在行为和临床试验中,通常只测试 1-2 mA 的有限强度范围,而且通常只测试一个强度;此外,结果还受大脑状态的影响。电流流动的测量和模型表明,对于相同的施加电流,个体之间的大脑电流存在显著差异。因此,试验受到个体间差异的影响,这使得考虑人群水平的剂量反应变得复杂。

结论

简单剂量反应的存在与否并不影响特定 tDCS 剂量对特定适应症的疗效。了解 tDCS 在人类应用中的剂量反应对于协议优化是必要的,包括个体化剂量以减少结果变异性,这需要智能设计剂量反应研究。

相似文献

10
Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.颅神经电刺激在认知和疾病中的应用。
Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):717-750. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.019. Epub 2020 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验