• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有限的自主权与伙伴关系:医疗保健中的专业关系

Limited autonomy and partnership: professional relationships in health care.

作者信息

Wilson-Barnett J

机构信息

King's College (KQC), London University.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1989 Mar;15(1):12-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.1.12.

DOI:10.1136/jme.15.1.12
PMID:2926780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1375754/
Abstract

Principles of autonomy and self-determination have been upheld as vital to modern-day medical and ethical practice. However, the complexities of current health care and changes in the expectation of some patients and their families justify a review of such concepts. Their limitations and relativities may suggest that other descriptions of partnership and negotiated goal-setting, while based on respect for autonomy, reflect more modern and ideal multi-disciplinary practices. Discussion should extend beyond the 'classic' participants of patient and doctor to a more realistic picture where other health carers are included. It is therefore apposite that other professional relationships are considered as they affect areas of doctors' and patients' responsibilities. Such partnership between members of the team may not be without problems and conflict, but the principle of negotiated agreements could result in more long-term harmony, and greater patient welfare.

摘要

自主和自决原则一直被视为现代医学和伦理实践的关键所在。然而,当前医疗保健的复杂性以及部分患者及其家属期望的变化,使得对这些概念进行审视成为必要。它们的局限性和相对性可能表明,基于尊重自主权的伙伴关系及协商目标设定的其他描述,更能反映现代理想的多学科实践。讨论不应局限于患者和医生这两个“经典”参与者,而应涵盖其他医护人员,以呈现更现实的情况。因此,考虑其他专业关系对医患责任领域的影响是恰当的。团队成员之间的这种伙伴关系可能并非没有问题和冲突,但协商达成协议的原则可能会带来更持久的和谐以及更大的患者福祉。

相似文献

1
Limited autonomy and partnership: professional relationships in health care.有限的自主权与伙伴关系:医疗保健中的专业关系
J Med Ethics. 1989 Mar;15(1):12-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.1.12.
2
Power issues in the doctor-patient relationship.医患关系中的权力问题。
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(4):449-62. doi: 10.1023/A:1013812802937.
3
Doctors in society. Medical professionalism in a changing world.社会中的医生。变化世界中的医学职业精神。
Clin Med (Lond). 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6 Suppl 1):S5-40.
4
Paternalism, autonomy and reciprocity: ethical perspectives in encounters with patients in psychiatric in-patient care.家长主义、自主性和互惠性:精神科住院患者医患关系中的伦理视角。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Dec 6;14:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-49.
5
Autonomy and paternalism: partners or rivals?自主性与家长作风:伙伴还是对手?
Br J Nurs. 1996;5(6):378-81. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1996.5.6.378.
6
Metaphors and models of doctor-patient relationships: their implications for autonomy.医患关系的隐喻与模式:它们对自主性的影响。
Theor Med. 1984 Feb;5(1):17-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00489243.
7
Responsibility to or for in the physician-patient relationship?医患关系中的责任是对患者负责还是为患者负责?
J Med Ethics. 1995 Apr;21(2):112-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.2.112.
8
Paternalism modernised.现代化的家长式作风。
J Med Ethics. 1985 Dec;11(4):184-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.4.184.
9
Patients as consumers of health care in South Africa: the ethical and legal implications.南非的医疗保健消费者:患者——伦理和法律问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Mar 21;14:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-15.
10
Physician-patient encounters "on a darkling plain.医患会面“在一片昏暗的平原上” 。 (此句单独看表意不太完整,可能在具体语境中有更确切含义)
West New Engl Law Rev. 1987;9(1):207-26.

本文引用的文献

1
Informed consent: what does it mean?知情同意:这意味着什么?
J Med Ethics. 1983 Jun;9(2):69-75. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.2.69.
2
A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.医学家长主义的辩护:最大化患者的自主性。
J Med Ethics. 1983 Mar;9(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.1.38.
3
Studies evaluating patient teaching: implications for practice.评估患者教育的研究:对实践的启示
Int J Nurs Stud. 1983;20(1):33-44. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(83)90037-8.
4
Patients' ethical obligation for their health.患者对自身健康的道德义务。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Sep;10(3):138-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.138.
5
Paternalism modernised.现代化的家长式作风。
J Med Ethics. 1985 Dec;11(4):184-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.4.184.
6
A nurse practitioner in general practice: working style and pattern of consultations.一名全科医疗中的执业护士:工作方式与诊疗模式
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Apr;37(297):154-7.
7
Informed consent and the psychiatric patient.知情同意与精神科患者
J Med Ethics. 1987 Mar;13(1):12-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.13.1.12.
8
Patient teaching or patient counselling?患者教育还是患者咨询?
J Adv Nurs. 1988 Mar;13(2):215-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1988.tb01410.x.