Neves Andre L A, Li Fuyong, Ghoshal Bibaswan, McAllister Tim, Guan Le L
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 7;8:2445. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02445. eCollection 2017.
The advent of next generation sequencing and bioinformatics tools have greatly advanced our knowledge about the phylogenetic diversity and ecological role of microbes inhabiting the mammalian gut. However, there is a lack of information on the evaluation of these computational tools in the context of the rumen microbiome as these programs have mostly been benchmarked on real or simulated datasets generated from human studies. In this study, we compared the outcomes of two methods, Kraken (mRNA based) and a pipeline developed in-house based on Mothur (16S rRNA based), to assess the taxonomic profiles (bacteria and archaea) of rumen microbial communities using total RNA sequencing of rumen fluid collected from 12 cattle with differing feed conversion ratios (FCR). Both approaches revealed a similar phyla distribution of the most abundant taxa, with Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria accounting for approximately 80% of total bacterial abundance. For bacterial taxa, although 69 genera were commonly detected by both methods, an additional 159 genera were exclusively identified by Kraken. Kraken detected 423 species, while Mothur was not able to assign bacterial sequences to the species level. For archaea, both methods generated similar results only for the abundance of Methanomassiliicoccaceae (previously referred as RCC), which comprised more than 65% of the total archaeal families. Taxon R4-41B was exclusively identified by Mothur in the rumen of feed efficient bulls, whereas Kraken uniquely identified Methanococcaceae in inefficient bulls. Although Kraken enhanced the microbial classification at the species level, identification of bacteria or archaea in the rumen is limited due to a lack of reference genomes for the rumen microbiome. The findings from this study suggest that the development of the combined pipelines using Mothur and Kraken is needed for a more inclusive and representative classification of microbiomes.
新一代测序技术和生物信息学工具的出现极大地推进了我们对栖息于哺乳动物肠道内微生物的系统发育多样性和生态作用的认识。然而,在瘤胃微生物组背景下对这些计算工具的评估信息却很匮乏,因为这些程序大多是在源自人类研究的真实或模拟数据集上进行基准测试的。在本研究中,我们比较了两种方法的结果,即Kraken(基于mRNA)和基于Mothur自行开发的流程(基于16S rRNA),通过对从12头具有不同饲料转化率(FCR)的牛采集的瘤胃液进行全RNA测序,来评估瘤胃微生物群落的分类概况(细菌和古菌)。两种方法都揭示了最丰富类群的相似门分布,拟杆菌门、厚壁菌门和变形菌门约占细菌总丰度的80%。对于细菌类群,虽然两种方法共同检测到69个属,但Kraken还额外鉴定出159个属。Kraken检测到423个物种,而Mothur无法将细菌序列分类到物种水平。对于古菌,两种方法仅在甲烷微球菌科(以前称为RCC)的丰度上产生了相似结果,该科占古菌总科的65%以上。分类群R4 - 41B仅在饲料效率高的公牛瘤胃中被Mothur鉴定出来,而Kraken在效率低的公牛瘤胃中唯一鉴定出了甲烷球菌科。尽管Kraken提高了物种水平的微生物分类,但由于缺乏瘤胃微生物组的参考基因组,瘤胃中细菌或古菌的鉴定仍然有限。本研究结果表明,需要开发结合Mothur和Kraken的流程,以实现对微生物组更全面和有代表性的分类。