Bialosky Joel E, Bishop Mark D, George Steven Z, Robinson Michael E
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Feb;19(1):11-9. doi: 10.1179/2042618610Y.0000000001.
The mechanisms through which manual therapy inhibits musculoskeletal pain are likely multifaceted and related to the interaction between the intervention, the patient, the practitioner, and the environment. Placebo is traditionally considered an inert intervention; however, the pain research literature suggests that placebo is an active hypoalgesic agent. Placebo response likely plays a role in all interventions for pain and we suggest that the same is true for the treatment effects associated with manual therapy. The magnitude of a placebo response may be influenced by negative mood, expectation, and conditioning. We suggest that manual therapists conceptualize placebo not only as a comparative intervention, but also as a potential active mechanism to partially account for treatment effects associated with manual therapy. We are not suggesting manual therapists include known sham or ineffective interventions in their clinical practice, but take steps to maximize placebo responses to reduce pain.
手法治疗抑制肌肉骨骼疼痛的机制可能是多方面的,且与干预措施、患者、治疗师和环境之间的相互作用有关。传统上,安慰剂被认为是一种惰性干预措施;然而,疼痛研究文献表明,安慰剂是一种有效的镇痛剂。安慰剂反应可能在所有疼痛干预措施中都起作用,我们认为手法治疗的治疗效果也是如此。安慰剂反应的程度可能会受到负面情绪、期望和条件作用的影响。我们建议,手法治疗师不仅应将安慰剂视为一种对照干预措施,还应将其视为一种潜在的积极机制,以部分解释手法治疗的治疗效果。我们并不是建议手法治疗师在临床实践中采用已知的虚假或无效干预措施,而是采取措施最大限度地提高安慰剂反应以减轻疼痛。