• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于护理学质性研究方法的哲学思考

Philosophical ponderings on qualitative research methods in nursing.

作者信息

Munhall P L

出版信息

Nurs Sci Q. 1989 Spring;2(1):20-8. doi: 10.1177/089431848900200109.

DOI:10.1177/089431848900200109
PMID:2927787
Abstract

This article focuses on the philosophical underpinnings of qualitative research methods. The historical context reflects an interpretive turn from envisioning nursing as a natural science to one of a human science. The phenomological paradigm is reflected upon in the questioning of perception, philosophy, nursing philosophy, paradigms, assumptions, and praxis. An invitation to embrace human understanding of experience, meaning of life worlds, the essences of experience, the attentive practice of thoughtfulness, and caring attunements is extended. The aims of discovery and qualitative research methods are presented within social, experiential, linguistic, and cultural contexts. In a fundamental sense, this paper is about the meaning and seriousness of human experience and nursing's efforts to study such experience faithfully, with reverence and wonderment.

摘要

本文聚焦于质性研究方法的哲学基础。历史背景反映了从将护理视为一门自然科学到人文科学的解释转向。在对感知、哲学、护理哲学、范式、假设和实践的质疑中体现了现象学范式。本文邀请人们接受对经验的人文理解、生活世界的意义、经验的本质、深思熟虑的专注实践以及关怀共鸣。发现的目标和质性研究方法在社会、经验、语言和文化背景中呈现。从根本意义上讲,本文探讨的是人类经验的意义和严肃性,以及护理为真诚、怀着敬意和惊叹去研究此类经验所做的努力。

相似文献

1
Philosophical ponderings on qualitative research methods in nursing.关于护理学质性研究方法的哲学思考
Nurs Sci Q. 1989 Spring;2(1):20-8. doi: 10.1177/089431848900200109.
2
Reinstating the 'Queen': understanding philosophical inquiry in nursing.恢复“女王”地位:理解护理中的哲学探究
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jan;61(1):115-121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04493.x.
3
Knowledge for the good of the individual and society: linking philosophy, disciplinary goals, theory, and practice.为了个人和社会的利益而获取知识:将哲学、学科目标、理论和实践联系起来。
Nurs Philos. 2010 Jan;11(1):42-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00423.x.
4
Building qualitative study design using nursing's disciplinary epistemology.运用护理学学科认识论构建质性研究设计。
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Feb;72(2):451-60. doi: 10.1111/jan.12822. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Nursing's syntax revisited: a critique of philosophies said to influence nursing theories.护理句法再探讨:对据称影响护理理论的哲学的批判
Int J Nurs Stud. 1993 Dec;30(6):477-88. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(93)90019-q.
6
Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge.解释性描述:一种用于发展护理知识的非分类质性方法。
Res Nurs Health. 1997 Apr;20(2):169-77. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199704)20:2<169::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-i.
7
Reductionism in the pursuit of nursing science: (in)congruent with nursing's core values?护理科学追求中的还原论:与护理的核心价值观(不)一致?
Can J Nurs Res. 2000 Sep;32(2):75-88.
8
The value of measurement for development of nursing knowledge: Underlying philosophy, contributions and critiques.测量对护理知识发展的价值:基本理念、贡献与批判。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Oct;74(10):2290-2300. doi: 10.1111/jan.13778. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
Understanding paradigms used for nursing research.理解护理研究中使用的范式。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Feb;53(4):459-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03740.x.
10
Nursing's metaparadigm concepts: disimpacting the debates.护理的元范式概念:消除争议。
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Jun;27(6):1257-68. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00623.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a post discharge telecare program for premature infants in Covid 19 era: Protocol for a mixed methods study.新冠疫情时代早产儿出院后远程护理项目的开发:一项混合方法研究方案
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Aug 31;12:261. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_951_22. eCollection 2023.
2
A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research.Q 方法论在医疗保健研究中的范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 21;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01309-7.