Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 11, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, 190 Thayer Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1400-1415. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0965-4. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
Exposure to audiovisual stimuli with a consistent spatial misalignment seems to result in a recalibration of unisensory auditory spatial representations. The previous studies have suggested that this so-called ventriloquism aftereffect is confined to the trained region of space, but yielded inconsistent results as to whether or not recalibration generalizes to untrained sound frequencies. Here, we reassessed the spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect by testing whether auditory spatial perception can be independently recalibrated for two different sound frequencies and/or at two different spatial locations. Recalibration was confined to locations within the trained hemifield, suggesting that spatial representations were independently adjusted for the two hemifields. The frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect depended on the presence or the absence of conflicting audiovisual adaptation stimuli within the same hemifield. Moreover, adaptation of two different sound frequencies in opposite directions (leftward vs. rightward) resulted in a selective suppression of leftward recalibration, even when the adapting stimuli were presented in different hemifields. Thus, instead of representing a fixed stimulus-driven process, cross-modal recalibration seems to critically depend on the sensory context and takes into account inconsistencies in the cross-modal input.
暴露于视听刺激与一致的空间失准似乎导致了单感听觉空间表示的重新校准。先前的研究表明,这种所谓的“腹语幻象后效”仅限于训练的空间区域,但对于重新校准是否推广到未经训练的声音频率,结果并不一致。在这里,我们通过测试听觉空间感知是否可以独立地重新校准两个不同的声音频率和/或两个不同的空间位置,重新评估了腹语幻象后效的空间和频率特异性。重新校准仅限于训练的半视野内的位置,这表明空间表示被独立地调整了两个半视野。腹语幻象后效的频率特异性取决于同一半视野内是否存在或不存在冲突的视听适应刺激。此外,两个不同方向(向左与向右)的声音频率的适应导致了对向左重新校准的选择性抑制,即使适应刺激在不同的半视野中呈现也是如此。因此,跨模态重新校准似乎不是代表固定的刺激驱动过程,而是取决于感觉上下文,并考虑到跨模态输入中的不一致性。