• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为他人做出医疗决策时的风险态度:一种实验方法。

Risk attitudes in medical decisions for others: An experimental approach.

作者信息

Arrieta Alejandro, García-Prado Ariadna, González Paula, Pinto-Prades José Luis

机构信息

Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.

Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26 Suppl 3:97-113. doi: 10.1002/hec.3628.

DOI:10.1002/hec.3628
PMID:29285873
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate how risk attitudes in medical decisions for others vary across health contexts. A lab experiment was designed to elicit the risk attitudes of 257 medical and nonmedical students by assigning them the role of a physician who must decide between treatments for patients. An interval regression model was used to estimate individual coefficients of relative risk aversion, and an estimation model was used to test for the effect of type of medical decision and experimental design characteristics on elicited risk aversion. We find that (a) risk attitudes vary across different health contexts, but risk aversion prevails in all of them; (b) students enrolled in health-related degrees show a higher degree of risk aversion; and (c) real rewards for third parties (patients) make subjects less risk-averse. The results underline the importance of accounting for attitudes towards risk in medical decision making.

摘要

本文旨在研究在为他人做出医疗决策时,风险态度如何因健康状况而异。设计了一项实验室实验,通过让257名医学和非医学专业学生扮演医生的角色,为患者选择治疗方案,来引出他们的风险态度。使用区间回归模型估计相对风险厌恶的个体系数,并使用估计模型检验医疗决策类型和实验设计特征对引出的风险厌恶的影响。我们发现:(a)风险态度因不同的健康状况而异,但在所有状况下风险厌恶都占主导;(b)攻读与健康相关学位的学生表现出更高程度的风险厌恶;(c)对第三方(患者)的实际奖励会使受试者的风险厌恶程度降低。研究结果强调了在医疗决策中考虑风险态度的重要性。

相似文献

1
Risk attitudes in medical decisions for others: An experimental approach.为他人做出医疗决策时的风险态度:一种实验方法。
Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26 Suppl 3:97-113. doi: 10.1002/hec.3628.
2
Physician risk attitudes and hospitalization of infants with bronchiolitis.医生的风险态度与毛细支气管炎婴儿的住院治疗
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):142-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.10.002.
3
My loss is your loss ... Sometimes: loss aversion and the effect of motivational biases.我的损失就是你的损失……有时:损失厌恶与动机偏差的影响。
Risk Anal. 2008 Aug;28(4):929-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01065.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
4
Attitudes of physicians, nurses and relatives towards end-of-life decisions concerning nursing home patients with dementia.医生、护士及亲属对患有痴呆症的疗养院患者临终决策的态度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.016. Epub 2005 Jun 21.
5
Student understanding of the relationship between the health professions and the pharmaceutical industry.学生对医疗行业与制药行业之间关系的理解。
Teach Learn Med. 2003 Winter;15(1):14-20. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1501_04.
6
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
7
Risk preferences and attitudes to surgery in decision making.决策过程中的风险偏好与对手术的态度。
Acta Orthop. 2017 Oct;88(5):466-471. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1298353. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
Sliding doors: Did drama-based inter-professional education improve the tensions round person-centred nursing and social care delivery for people with dementia: A mixed method exploratory study.滑动门:基于戏剧的跨专业教育是否改善了围绕以患者为中心的痴呆症患者护理和社会护理提供方面的紧张关系:一项混合方法探索性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Apr;51:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
9
Rehabilitation students' attitudes toward persons with disabilities in high- and low-stakes social contexts: A conjoint analysis.康复专业学生在高风险和低风险社会情境中对残疾人的态度:联合分析
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Dec 30;28(24):1517-27. doi: 10.1080/09638280600646102.
10
Attitudes toward risk and ambiguity in patients with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍患者的风险与模糊态度。
Mol Autism. 2017 Aug 16;8:45. doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0162-8. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Difference in time and risk preferences: physicians and general population across genders.时间和风险偏好的差异:不同性别的医生与普通人群
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 5;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00653-4.
2
Evaluating Risk and Benefit Sensitivity for Cognitive Treatments.评估认知治疗的风险和效益敏感性。
J Cogn Enhanc. 2025;9(2):214-229. doi: 10.1007/s41465-025-00319-3. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
3
A standard gamble study to determine health state utilities associated with seizures in glioma in the UK.一项在英国开展的标准博弈研究,旨在确定与胶质瘤癫痫发作相关的健康状态效用值。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02348-0.
4
Looking inside the lab: a systematic literature review of economic experiments in health service provision.审视实验室内部:卫生服务提供经济实验的系统文献综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Sep;25(7):1177-1204. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01662-y. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
5
Risk attitude and belief updating: theory and experiment.风险态度与信念更新:理论与实验
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1281296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1281296. eCollection 2023.
6
The effect of domain and framing on elicited risk aversion.域和框架对诱发风险厌恶的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 26;17(9):e0267696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267696. eCollection 2022.
7
Eliciting risk preferences that predict risky health behavior: A comparison of two approaches.引出能预测危险健康行为的风险偏好:两种方法的比较。
Health Econ. 2022 May;31(5):836-858. doi: 10.1002/hec.4486. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
8
Monitoring COVID-19 on Social Media: Development of an End-to-End Natural Language Processing Pipeline Using a Novel Triage and Diagnosis Approach.社交媒体上的 COVID-19 监测:使用新型分诊和诊断方法开发端到端自然语言处理管道。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 28;24(2):e30397. doi: 10.2196/30397.
9
Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study.基于胸痛的急诊科患者的分级冠状动脉风险分层:一项对照队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e022539. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022539. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
10
Economics influences therapy decisions in chronic myeloid leukaemia: should it?经济学影响慢性髓性白血病的治疗决策:它应该吗?
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;147(12):3693-3698. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03607-5. Epub 2021 Apr 22.