• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估基本护理:制定单元级别的质量测量和改进计划。

Evaluating fundamentals of care: The development of a unit-level quality measurement and improvement programme.

机构信息

Counties Manukau Health District Health Board, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Waitemata District Health Board, North Shore Hospital, Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2360-2372. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14250. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.14250
PMID:29292544
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The project aimed to develop a unit-level quality measurement and improvement programme using evidence-based fundamentals of care.

BACKGROUND

Feedback from patients, families, whānau, staff and audit data in 2014 indicated variability in the delivery of fundamental aspects of care such as monitoring, nutrition, pain management and environmental cleanliness at a New Zealand District Health Board.

DESIGN

A general inductive approach was used to explore the fundamentals of care and design a measurement and improvement programme, the Patient and Whānau Centred Care Standards (PWCCS), focused on fundamental care.

METHODS

Five phases were used to explore the evidence, and design and test a measurement and improvement framework.

RESULTS

Nine identified fundamental elements of care were used to define expected standards of care and develop and test a measurement and improvement framework. Four six-monthly peer reviews have been undertaken since June 2015. Charge Nurse Managers used results to identify quality improvements. Significant improvement was demonstrated overall, in six of the 27 units, in seven of the nine standards and three of the four measures. In all, 89% (n = 24) of units improved their overall result.

CONCLUSION

The PWCCS measurement and improvement framework make visible nursing fundamentals of care in line with continuous quality improvement to increase quality of care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Delivering fundamentals of care is described by nurses as getting ?back to basics'. Patient and family feedback supports the centrality of fundamentals of care to their hospital experience. Implementing a unit-level fundamentals of care quality measurement and improvement programme clarifies expected standards of care, highlights the contribution of fundamentals of care to quality and provides a mechanism for ongoing improvements.

摘要

目的和目标

该项目旨在使用循证护理基础知识制定单元级别的质量衡量和改进计划。

背景

2014 年,来自患者、家属、家庭、员工和审计数据的反馈表明,在新西兰地区卫生局,护理的基本方面(如监测、营养、疼痛管理和环境卫生)的提供存在差异。

设计

采用一般归纳方法探索护理基础知识并设计衡量和改进计划,即患者和家庭为中心的护理标准(PWCCS),重点关注基本护理。

方法

使用五个阶段探索证据,并设计和测试衡量和改进框架。

结果

确定了护理的九个基本要素,用于定义预期的护理标准,并开发和测试衡量和改进框架。自 2015 年 6 月以来,已经进行了四次为期六个月的同行审查。护士长利用结果确定质量改进。在七个标准中的七个和四个指标中的三个方面,在 27 个单元中的六个单元中显示出整体显著改善。共有 89%(n=24)的单元提高了整体结果。

结论

PWCCS 衡量和改进框架使护理基础知识的护理质量可视化,符合持续质量改进,以提高护理质量。

临床实践相关性

护士将提供基本护理描述为“回归基础”。患者和家属的反馈支持基本护理对其住院体验的核心地位。实施单元级别的基本护理质量衡量和改进计划,可以明确预期的护理标准,突出基本护理对质量的贡献,并为持续改进提供机制。

相似文献

1
Evaluating fundamentals of care: The development of a unit-level quality measurement and improvement programme.评估基本护理:制定单元级别的质量测量和改进计划。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2360-2372. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14250. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
2
Implementation of Releasing Time to Care - the productive ward.实施释放护理时间——高效病房。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Jul;17(5):647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01026.x.
3
Factors influencing the delivery of the fundamentals of care: Perceptions of nurses, nursing leaders and healthcare consumers.影响基本护理提供的因素:护士、护理领导者和医疗保健消费者的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2373-2386. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14183. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
Reflections on the implementation and evaluation of a system-wide improvement programme based on the fundamentals of care: Lessons learned.基于关怀基本原则的全系统改进计划的实施和评估的反思:经验教训。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Mar;79(3):980-990. doi: 10.1111/jan.15389. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
5
Building the capacity for evidence-based clinical nursing leadership: the role of executive co-coaching and group clinical supervision for quality patient services.培养基于证据的临床护理领导力的能力:执行联合辅导和小组临床督导对优质患者服务的作用。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Mar;15(2):230-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00750.x.
6
Quality improvement: the divergent views of managers and clinicians.质量改进:管理者与临床医生的不同观点
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Jan;15(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00664.x.
7
Insights from staff nurses and managers on unit-specific nursing performance dashboards: a qualitative study.从护士和护士长角度看特定单元护理绩效仪表板:定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):1001-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002595. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
8
Improving the quality of nurse-influenced patient care in the intensive care unit.提高重症监护病房中护士影响的患者护理质量。
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Nov;22(6):339-347. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12266. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
9
Exploring person-centred fundamental nursing care in hospital wards: A multi-site ethnography.探索医院病房中以患者为中心的基础护理:一项多地点人种志研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(11-12):1933-1944. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15024. Epub 2019 Sep 8.
10
Parents' and nurses' attitudes to family-centred care: an Irish perspective.父母与护士对以家庭为中心护理的态度:爱尔兰视角
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(12):2341-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01967.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Codesigning a Nursing Leadership Program to Transform Value and Delivery Systems for Fundamental Care.共同设计一个护理领导力项目,以转变基础护理的价值和服务体系。
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Aug 31;2023:1318377. doi: 10.1155/2023/1318377. eCollection 2023.
2
The Fundamentals of Care in Practice: A Qualitative Contextual Inquiry.实践中的护理基础:一项质性情境探究
Nurs Inq. 2025 Apr;32(2):e70000. doi: 10.1111/nin.70000.
3
An Economic Cost Analysis of Implementing a Frailty Care Bundle to Reduce Risk of Hospital Associated Decline Among Older Patients.
实施衰弱护理包以降低老年患者医院相关性衰退风险的经济成本分析
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2024 Sep 1;9(3):218-226. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-09-218. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
The ILC Maine statement: Time for the fundamental care [r]evolution.缅因州独立生活中心声明:是时候进行基本护理革命了。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jan;81(1):523-536. doi: 10.1111/jan.16108. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
5
How does nursing-sensitive indicator feedback with nursing or interprofessional teams work and shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review.护理敏感指标如何与护理或跨专业团队合作,并塑造护理绩效改进系统?快速的现实主义综述。
Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 24;11(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02026-y.
6
Creating an Indigenous Māori-centred model of relational health: A literature review of Māori models of health.创建一个以毛利人为中心的关系健康模式:对毛利人健康模式的文献综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Dec;30(23-24):3539-3555. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15859. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Where and how does fundamental care fit within seminal nursing theories: A narrative review and synthesis of key nursing concepts.基础护理在主要护理理论中的定位和作用:关键护理概念的叙事性综述和综合。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(19-20):3652-3666. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15420. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Comfort during the bed bath-A randomised crossover trial on the effect of washing without water versus water and soap in nursing students.床上擦浴时的舒适度——一项关于护理专业学生无水擦拭与用水和肥皂擦拭效果的随机交叉试验。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Aug;30(15-16):2234-2245. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15610. Epub 2021 May 6.
9
A quest for quality care: Exploration of a model of leadership relationships, work engagement, and patient outcomes.追求优质护理:领导力关系、工作投入和患者结局模型的探索。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jan;77(1):207-220. doi: 10.1111/jan.14583. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
10
Speaking Up for Fundamental Care: the ILC Aalborg Statement.倡导基本关怀:奥胡斯国际会议宣言。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 9;9(12):e033077. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033077.