Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA, USA.
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):5772-5796. doi: 10.1177/0886260517723143. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
The White House Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault recommends bystander engagement programming as part of campus sexual assault prevention efforts. Measuring students' bystander behavior, and thus, assessing the effectiveness of such programming, is a challenging endeavor due to the range of risk situations students may witness, as well as the nuances in potential barriers students may face in these situations. Currently, many studies include dichotomous measures of bystander behavior without gathering further information about students' opportunities to intervene, barriers to intervening, and intervention strategies. The current study sought to implement a more comprehensive approach to understanding the types of sexual assault risk situations students report to witness, as well as their response in those situations, reasons for not intervening, and any gender differences therein. In 2014, undergraduate students ( = 9,358) at a large, public university in the Northeast completed a web-based survey to assess bystander opportunities and responses for six different risk situations. Results show that prosocial bystander responses varied depending on the risk situation. Of those students with opportunities to intervene, noninterveners reported the situation was "none of their business" or that they were "unsure of what to do." Interveners reported to have either "confronted the situation directly" or "went and got assistance." We also observed significant gender differences in students' reported intervention opportunities and bystander responses. The findings of this study have several important implications for bystander engagement programming and future research.
白宫学生性侵犯预防工作组建议将旁观者干预计划作为校园性侵犯预防工作的一部分。由于学生可能目睹的风险情况范围广泛,以及学生在这些情况下可能面临的潜在障碍的细微差别,因此衡量学生的旁观者行为,从而评估此类计划的有效性是一项具有挑战性的任务。目前,许多研究都包含了旁观者行为的二分法措施,而没有收集有关学生干预机会、干预障碍和干预策略的更多信息。本研究旨在采用更全面的方法来了解学生报告的性侵犯风险情况的类型,以及他们在这些情况下的反应、不干预的原因以及其中存在的任何性别差异。2014 年,东北部一所大型公立大学的本科生(n=9358)完成了一项基于网络的调查,以评估六种不同风险情况下的旁观者机会和反应。结果表明,亲社会的旁观者反应取决于风险情况。在有机会进行干预的学生中,不干预者表示情况“与自己无关”或“不确定该做什么”。干预者则报告说他们“直接面对了情况”或“寻求了帮助”。我们还观察到学生报告的干预机会和旁观者反应存在显著的性别差异。这项研究的结果对旁观者干预计划和未来的研究有几个重要的启示。