• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以往工作场所性骚扰受害经历对西班牙女性作为旁观者进行干预的责任感的影响:对神话的接受程度和感知严重程度的中介作用

Impact on Spanish women of previous workplace victimization experiences of workplace sexual harassment on the responsibility to intervene as bystander: Mediating roles of myth acceptance and perceived severity.

作者信息

Sánchez-Prada Andrés, Ferreiro-Basurto Virginia, Delgado-Álvarez Carmen, Vázquez-González Leila I, Nardi-Rodríguez Ainara, Ferrer-Perez Victoria A

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology. Pontifical University of Salamanca, C/ Compañía, 5, Salamanca 37002, Spain.

Faculty of Psychology. University of Balearic Islands, Ctra. Valldemossa km. 7.5, Palma 07122, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;24(3):100497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100497. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100497
PMID:39282220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402241/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bystander behaviors can be an important key for preventing all forms of violence against women. Identifying their facilitators and barriers becomes a priority. The aim of this research is to analyze the impact of the previous experiences of women (as sexual harassment victim or bystander) on their perceived responsibility to intervene as bystander in a case of workplace sexual harassment and to determine the possible mediating role of certain attitudinal and evaluative factors.

METHOD

A non-probability convenience sample of 633 Spanish women answered a sociodemographic data questionnaire, a victimization questionnaire designed ad hoc, and the Questionnaire of Intention to Help in VAW Cases.

RESULTS

The results obtained indicate that previous victimization experiences as a victim or witness of sexual harassment impact the responsibility to intervene, mediated by the acceptance of sexual harassment myths and the perceived severity of workplace sexual harassment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may help to understand how to design prevention programs and which key variables to incorporate.

摘要

背景

旁观者行为可能是预防一切形式暴力侵害妇女行为的重要关键。识别其促进因素和障碍成为当务之急。本研究的目的是分析女性以往经历(作为性骚扰受害者或旁观者)对其在工作场所性骚扰案件中作为旁观者进行干预的感知责任的影响,并确定某些态度和评价因素可能起到的中介作用。

方法

对633名西班牙女性进行非概率便利抽样,她们回答了一份社会人口统计学数据问卷、一份专门设计的受害情况问卷以及《暴力侵害妇女案件帮助意向问卷》。

结果

所得结果表明,以往作为性骚扰受害者或目击者的受害经历会影响干预责任,这种影响由对性骚扰谬见的接受程度和对工作场所性骚扰严重程度的感知所介导。

结论

这些结果可能有助于理解如何设计预防方案以及纳入哪些关键变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/11402241/de4d2d0cd0ce/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/11402241/ea47e60cb212/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/11402241/846731246958/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/11402241/de4d2d0cd0ce/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/11402241/ea47e60cb212/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/11402241/846731246958/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/11402241/de4d2d0cd0ce/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact on Spanish women of previous workplace victimization experiences of workplace sexual harassment on the responsibility to intervene as bystander: Mediating roles of myth acceptance and perceived severity.以往工作场所性骚扰受害经历对西班牙女性作为旁观者进行干预的责任感的影响:对神话的接受程度和感知严重程度的中介作用
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;24(3):100497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100497. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
2
Street Sexual Harassment: Experiences and Attitudes among Young Spanish People.街头性骚扰:西班牙年轻人的经历和态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 1;18(19):10375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910375.
3
Barriers to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Harassment: The Dark Triad and Rape Myth acceptance in Indonesia, Singapore, and United Kingdom.旁观者干预性骚扰的障碍:印度尼西亚、新加坡和英国的黑暗人格三联征和强奸谬论接受度。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22151-NP22174. doi: 10.1177/08862605211072150. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
Barriers to sexual harassment bystander intervention in Ecuadorian universities.厄瓜多尔大学中对性骚扰旁观者干预的障碍。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun;17(6):1029-1040. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1884278. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Consequences and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Women and Men Witnesses and Non-Witnesses.职场性骚扰:男女目击者与非目击者的后果及自我效能感认知
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 8;12(9):326. doi: 10.3390/bs12090326.
6
Exposure to Workplace Sexual Harassment among Women and Men Farmworkers in the U.S. and Mexico.美国和墨西哥男女农场工人遭受工作场所性骚扰的情况。
J Agric Saf Health. 2021 Oct 21;27(4):229-247. doi: 10.13031/jash.14514.
7
Barriers to Bystander Interventions for Sexual Assault: Impact of Personal History of Sexual Victimization.旁观者干预性侵犯的障碍:性受害个人史的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP16727-NP16749. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023491. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
Are They Really Helping Them to "Get Over It"? Bystander Behavior After Sexual Harassment Incidents in the Fashion Industry.他们真的在帮助她们“克服它”吗?时尚界性骚扰事件后的旁观者行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Apr;39(7-8):1704-1730. doi: 10.1177/08862605231209995. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
9
[Social perception of workplace sexual harassment in the healthcare system.].[医疗系统中工作场所性骚扰的社会认知。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2023 Mar 24;97:e202303023.
10
Preventing Sexual Violence Through Bystander Intervention: Attitudes, Behaviors, Missed Opportunities, and Barriers to Intervention Among Australian University Students.通过旁观者干预预防性暴力:澳大利亚大学生的态度、行为、错失的机会及干预障碍
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):2816-2840. doi: 10.1177/0886260518764395. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
The Questionnaire of Intention to Help in VAW Cases (QIHVC): Development and preliminary results.《针对暴力侵害妇女案件的帮助意愿调查问卷》(QIHVC):编制与初步结果
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1153678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153678. eCollection 2023.
2
A Systematic Review Exploring Variables Related to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Violence Contexts.一项探索性暴力情境中旁观者干预相关变量的系统评价
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jul;24(3):1727-1742. doi: 10.1177/15248380221079660. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
3
Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018.
2018 年全球、区域和国家对女性身体或性或两者兼具的亲密伴侣暴力的流行率估计。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):803-813. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Barriers to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Harassment: The Dark Triad and Rape Myth acceptance in Indonesia, Singapore, and United Kingdom.旁观者干预性骚扰的障碍:印度尼西亚、新加坡和英国的黑暗人格三联征和强奸谬论接受度。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22151-NP22174. doi: 10.1177/08862605211072150. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
None of My Business? An Experiment Analyzing Willingness to Formally Report Incidents of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women.事不关己?一项分析对女性亲密伴侣暴力事件进行正式报告意愿的实验。
Violence Against Women. 2022 Jul;28(9):2163-2185. doi: 10.1177/10778012211025990. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
Barriers to Bystander Interventions for Sexual Assault: Impact of Personal History of Sexual Victimization.旁观者干预性侵犯的障碍:性受害个人史的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP16727-NP16749. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023491. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
The Situational-Cognitive Model of Adolescent Bystander Behavior: Modeling Bystander Decision-Making in the Context of Bullying and Teen Dating Violence.青少年旁观者行为的情境认知模型:在欺凌和青少年约会暴力背景下对旁观者决策进行建模
Psychol Violence. 2017 Jan;7(1):33-44. doi: 10.1037/vio0000033. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
8
Barriers to sexual harassment bystander intervention in Ecuadorian universities.厄瓜多尔大学中对性骚扰旁观者干预的障碍。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun;17(6):1029-1040. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1884278. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
9
"Is It My Responsibility?": A Qualitative Review of University Students' Perspectives on Bystander Behavior.“这是我的责任吗?”:对大学生旁观者行为的定性综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jan;23(1):117-131. doi: 10.1177/1524838020933829. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
Predicting Bystander Intention to Intervene: The Role of Gender-Specific System Justification and Rape Myth Acceptance for Men and Women.预测旁观者的干预意图:特定性别的系统正当化以及男性和女性对强奸谬论的接受程度所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 13;11:326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00326. eCollection 2020.