Hu Bihe, Bolus Daniel, Brown J Quincy
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, 500 Lindy Boggs Center, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Nov 13;8(12):5546-5559. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.005546. eCollection 2017 Dec 1.
Inverted selective plane illumination microscopy (iSPIM) enables fast, large field-of-view, long term imaging with compatibility with conventional sample mounting. However, the imaging quality can be deteriorated in thick tissues due to sample scattering. Three strategies have been adopted in this paper to optimize the imaging performance of iSPIM on thick tissue imaging: electronic confocal slit detection (eCSD), structured illumination (SI) and the two combined. We compared the image contrast when using SPIM, confocal SPIM (using eCSD alone), SI SPIM (using SI alone) or confocal-SI SPIM (combining both methods) on images of gelatin phantom and highly-scattering fluorescently-stained human tissue. We demonstrate that all the three methods showed remarkable contrast enhancement on both samples compared to iSPIM alone, and SI SPIM and the combined confocal-SI mode outperformed confocal SPIM in contrast enhancement. Moreover, the use of SI at high pattern frequencies outperformed confocal SPIM in terms of optical sectioning capability. However, image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was decreased at high pattern frequencies when imaging scattering samples with SI SPIM. By combining eCSD with SI to reduce background signal and noise, the superior optical sectioning performance of SI could be achieved while also maintaining high image SNR.
倒置选择性平面照明显微镜(iSPIM)能够实现快速、大视野、长期成像,且与传统样品固定方式兼容。然而,由于样品散射,在厚组织中成像质量可能会下降。本文采用了三种策略来优化iSPIM在厚组织成像上的成像性能:电子共焦狭缝检测(eCSD)、结构光照(SI)以及两者结合。我们比较了在明胶模型和高散射荧光染色人体组织图像上使用SPIM、共焦SPIM(仅使用eCSD)、SI SPIM(仅使用SI)或共焦 - SI SPIM(结合两种方法)时的图像对比度。我们证明,与单独使用iSPIM相比,这三种方法在两个样品上均显示出显著的对比度增强,并且SI SPIM和组合的共焦 - SI模式在对比度增强方面优于共焦SPIM。此外,在光学切片能力方面,高图案频率下使用SI优于共焦SPIM。然而,当用SI SPIM对散射样品成像时,在高图案频率下图像信噪比(SNR)会降低。通过将eCSD与SI相结合以减少背景信号和噪声,可以在保持高图像SNR的同时实现SI卓越的光学切片性能。