F. Joseph Halcomb III, M.D. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, 40506, USA.
School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 20;17(Suppl 3):167. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0562-x.
Collaboration between humans and computers has become pervasive and ubiquitous, however current computer systems are limited in that they fail to address the emotional component. An accurate understanding of human emotions is necessary for these computers to trigger proper feedback. Among multiple emotional channels, physiological signals are synchronous with emotional responses; therefore, analyzing physiological changes is a recognized way to estimate human emotions. In this paper, a three-stage decision method is proposed to recognize four emotions based on physiological signals in the multi-subject context. Emotion detection is achieved by using a stage-divided strategy in which each stage deals with a fine-grained goal.
The decision method consists of three stages. During the training process, the initial stage transforms mixed training subjects to separate groups, thus eliminating the effect of individual differences. The second stage categorizes four emotions into two emotion pools in order to reduce recognition complexity. The third stage trains a classifier based on emotions in each emotion pool. During the testing process, a test case or test trial will be initially classified to a group followed by classification into an emotion pool in the second stage. An emotion will be assigned to the test trial in the final stage. In this paper we consider two different ways of allocating four emotions into two emotion pools. A comparative analysis is also carried out between the proposal and other methods.
An average recognition accuracy of 77.57% was achieved on the recognition of four emotions with the best accuracy of 86.67% to recognize the positive and excited emotion. Using differing ways of allocating four emotions into two emotion pools, we found there is a difference in the effectiveness of a classifier on learning each emotion. When compared to other methods, the proposed method demonstrates a significant improvement in recognizing four emotions in the multi-subject context.
The proposed three-stage decision method solves a crucial issue which is 'individual differences' in multi-subject emotion recognition and overcomes the suboptimal performance with respect to direct classification of multiple emotions. Our study supports the observation that the proposed method represents a promising methodology for recognizing multiple emotions in the multi-subject context.
人类与计算机的协作已经变得无处不在,然而当前的计算机系统存在局限性,因为它们无法解决情感因素。这些计算机需要准确理解人类情感,才能触发适当的反馈。在多种情感通道中,生理信号与情感反应同步;因此,分析生理变化是一种公认的估计人类情感的方法。在本文中,提出了一种基于多主体生理信号的四元情绪识别的三阶段决策方法。通过采用分阶段策略的情绪检测,每个阶段都有一个精细的目标,从而实现情绪识别。
决策方法由三个阶段组成。在训练过程中,初始阶段将混合训练主体转换为单独的组,从而消除个体差异的影响。第二阶段将四种情绪分为两个情绪池,以降低识别复杂度。第三阶段基于每个情绪池中的情绪训练分类器。在测试过程中,测试案例或测试试验将首先分类到一个组,然后在第二阶段分类到一个情绪池。最后在第三阶段将为测试试验分配一个情绪。在本文中,我们考虑了将四种情绪分配到两个情绪池的两种不同方式。还对建议方法与其他方法进行了比较分析。
在识别四种情绪时,平均识别准确率为 77.57%,最佳准确率为 86.67%,用于识别积极和兴奋的情绪。使用不同的方式将四种情绪分配到两个情绪池,我们发现分类器在学习每种情绪时的有效性存在差异。与其他方法相比,该方法在多主体环境中识别四种情绪方面表现出显著的改进。
提出的三阶段决策方法解决了多主体情感识别中的“个体差异”这一关键问题,克服了直接对多种情感进行分类的次优性能。我们的研究支持这样一种观点,即该方法代表了一种在多主体环境中识别多种情感的有前途的方法。