Wong R M Y, Choy M H V, Li M C M, Leung K-S, K-H Chow S, Cheung W-H, Cheng J C Y
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital Authority, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, Hong Kong and Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Bone Joint Res. 2018 Jan;7(1):6-11. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2016-0334.R2.
The treatment of osteoporotic fractures is a major challenge, and the enhancement of healing is critical as a major goal in modern fracture management. Most osteoporotic fractures occur at the metaphyseal bone region but few models exist and the healing is still poorly understood. A systematic review was conducted to identify and analyse the appropriateness of current osteoporotic metaphyseal fracture animal models.
A literature search was performed on the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and relevant articles were selected. A total of 19 studies were included. Information on the animal, induction of osteoporosis, fracture technique, site and fixation, healing results, and utility of the model were extracted.
Fracture techniques included drill hole defects (3 of 19), bone defects (3 of 19), partial osteotomy (1 of 19), and complete osteotomies (12 of 19). Drill hole models and incomplete osteotomy models are easy to perform and allow the study of therapeutic agents but do not represent the usual clinical setting. Additionally, biomaterials can be filled into drill hole defects for analysis. Complete osteotomy models are most commonly used and are best suited for the investigation of therapeutic drugs or noninvasive interventions. The metaphyseal defect models allow the study of biomaterials, which are associated with complex and comminuted osteoporotic fractures.
For a clinically relevant model, we propose that an animal model should satisfy the following criteria to study osteoporotic fracture healing: 1) induction of osteoporosis, 2) complete osteotomy or defect at the metaphysis unilaterally, and 3) internal fixation.: R. M. Y. Wong, M. H. V. Choy, M. C. M. Li, K-S. Leung, S. K-H. Chow, W-H. Cheung, J. C. Y. Cheng. A systematic review of current osteoporotic metaphyseal fracture animal models. 2018;7:6-11. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2016-0334.R2.
骨质疏松性骨折的治疗是一项重大挑战,促进骨折愈合作为现代骨折治疗的主要目标至关重要。大多数骨质疏松性骨折发生在干骺端骨区域,但相关模型较少,且骨折愈合情况仍未得到充分了解。本研究进行了一项系统评价,以确定并分析当前骨质疏松性干骺端骨折动物模型的适用性。
在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库中进行文献检索,并筛选相关文章。总共纳入19项研究。提取有关动物、骨质疏松诱导方法、骨折技术、骨折部位及固定方式、愈合结果以及模型实用性的信息。
骨折技术包括钻孔缺损(19项研究中的3项)、骨缺损(19项研究中的3项)、部分截骨术(19项研究中的1项)和完全截骨术(19项研究中的12项)。钻孔模型和不完全截骨模型操作简便,可用于研究治疗药物,但不能代表通常的临床情况。此外,可将生物材料填充到钻孔缺损中进行分析。完全截骨模型使用最为广泛,最适合用于研究治疗药物或非侵入性干预措施。干骺端缺损模型可用于研究与复杂粉碎性骨质疏松性骨折相关的生物材料。
对于具有临床相关性的模型,我们建议动物模型应满足以下标准以研究骨质疏松性骨折愈合:1)诱导骨质疏松;2)单侧干骺端完全截骨或形成缺损;3)内固定。:R.M.Y. Wong、M.H.V. Choy、M.C.M. Li、K-S. Leung、S.K-H. Chow、W-H. Cheung、J.C.Y. Cheng。当前骨质疏松性干骺端骨折动物模型的系统评价。2018;7:6 - 11。DOI:10.1302/2046 - 3758.71.BJR - 2016 - 0334.R2