SHORE & Whariki Research Centre, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, Nottingham, UK.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Aug;37 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):S18-S26. doi: 10.1111/dar.12654. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
To report data on the implementation of alcohol policies regarding availability and marketing, and drink driving, along with ratings of enforcement from two small high-income to three high-middle income countries, and one low-middle income country.
This study uses the Alcohol Environment Protocol, an International Alcohol Control study research tool, which documents the alcohol policy environment by standardised collection of data from administrative sources, observational studies and interviews with key informants to allow for cross-country comparison and change over time.
All countries showed adoption to varying extents of key effective policy approaches outlined in the World Health Organization Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol (2010). High-income countries were more likely to allocate resources to enforcement. However, where enforcement and implementation were high, policy on availability was fairly liberal. Key Informants judged alcohol to be very available in both high- and middle-income countries, reflecting liberal policy in the former and less implementation and enforcement and informal (unlicensed) sale of alcohol in the latter. Marketing was largely unrestricted in all countries and while drink-driving legislation was in place, it was less well enforced in middle-income countries.
In countries with fewer resources, alcohol policies are less effective because of lack of implementation and enforcement and, in the case of marketing, lack of regulation. This has implications for the increase in consumption taking place as a result of the expanding distribution and marketing of commercial alcohol and consequent increases in alcohol-related harm.
报告两个小的高收入国家和三个高收入中等偏上收入国家以及一个低收入中等偏上收入国家在供应和营销以及酒驾方面执行酒精政策的数据,并对执行情况进行评级。
本研究使用酒精环境议定书(Alcohol Environment Protocol),这是国际酒精控制研究的一种研究工具,通过从行政来源、观察性研究和关键知情人访谈中标准收集数据,记录酒精政策环境,从而实现跨国比较和随时间变化。
所有国家都在不同程度上采用了世界卫生组织《全球减少有害酒精使用战略》(2010 年)中概述的有效政策方法。高收入国家更有可能为执法分配资源。然而,在执法和执行力度高的地方,供应政策相当宽松。关键知情人判断高收入和中等收入国家的酒精供应都非常充足,这反映了前者政策宽松,后者执法和执行不力,以及非正规(无牌)销售酒精。在所有国家,营销基本上不受限制,尽管有酒驾立法,但在中等收入国家执法不力。
在资源较少的国家,由于缺乏执行和执法,以及营销方面缺乏监管,酒精政策效果较差。这对商业酒精分销和营销的扩大以及随之而来的酒精相关伤害增加导致的消费增长产生了影响。