Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
RMD Open. 2020 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001083.
With increasing recognition of the high burden and impact of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and the growing number of therapeutic options, there has been an intensifying focus on treatment strategy in recent years. In 2015, the Tight Control of Psoriatic Arthritis study confirmed the clinical benefit of using a treat-to-target approach in PsA. This randomised controlled trial found benefits in both arthritis and psoriasis disease activity as well as lower disease impact reported by patients, although participants allocated to tight control experienced a higher rate of serious adverse events. European and international recommendations support the use of a treat-to-target approach in PsA and have offered specific advice on how to do this using outcomes such as the minimal disease activity criteria. However, implementation of this approach in routine practice is low, with real-world data highlighting undertreatment as a result. Recent qualitative work with physicians in the UK has helped researchers to understand the barriers to implementation of treat-to-target in PsA. We now need to address these barriers, provide education and support to non-specialist clinicians in routine practice, and aid the translation of optimal care to the clinic.
随着人们对银屑病关节炎(PsA)负担和影响的认识不断提高,以及治疗选择的日益增多,近年来人们越来越关注治疗策略。2015 年,Tight Control of Psoriatic Arthritis 研究证实了在 PsA 中采用靶向治疗方法的临床益处。这项随机对照试验发现,关节炎和银屑病的疾病活动度以及患者报告的疾病影响都有改善,尽管接受严格控制治疗的患者发生严重不良事件的比例更高。欧洲和国际建议支持在 PsA 中采用靶向治疗方法,并就如何使用疾病活动度等指标提供了具体建议。然而,这种方法在常规实践中的实施率很低,现实世界的数据突出了治疗不足的问题。最近在英国对医生进行的定性研究帮助研究人员了解了在 PsA 中实施靶向治疗的障碍。我们现在需要解决这些障碍,为常规实践中的非专科临床医生提供教育和支持,并帮助将最佳护理转化为临床实践。