Centre for the Study of Group Processes, School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):310-326. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12233. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
A few weeks prior to the EU referendum (23rd June 2016) two broadly representative samples of the electorate were drawn in Kent (the south-east of England, N = 1,001) and Scotland (N = 1,088) for online surveys that measured their trust in politicians, concerns about acceptable levels of immigration, threat from immigration, European identification, and voting intention. We tested an aversion amplification hypothesis that the impact of immigration concerns on threat and identification would be amplified when political trust was low. We hypothesized that the effect of aversion amplification on voting intentions would be mediated first by perceived threat from immigration, and then by (dis) identification with Europe. Results in both samples were consistent with this hypothesis and suggest that voters were most likely to reject the political status quo (choose Brexit) when concerns that immigration levels were too high were combined with a low level of trust in politicians.
在欧盟公投(2016 年 6 月 23 日)前几周,在英格兰东南部的肯特郡(N=1001)和苏格兰(N=1088)抽取了两个具有代表性的选民样本,进行了在线调查,以衡量他们对政客的信任、对可接受移民水平的担忧、对移民的威胁、欧洲认同和投票意向。我们检验了一个回避放大假设,即在政治信任度较低时,对移民问题的担忧对威胁和认同的影响会放大。我们假设,对回避的放大作用对投票意向的影响将首先通过对移民的感知威胁来介导,然后通过(不)与欧洲认同来介导。两个样本的结果都与这一假设一致,表明当人们认为移民水平过高,并对政客的信任度较低时,他们最有可能拒绝政治现状(选择英国退欧)。