Suppr超能文献

英国脱欧背景下民族主义意识形态的认知基础。

Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom;

Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 8;115(19):E4532-E4540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708960115. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

Abstract

Nationalistic identities often play an influential role in citizens' voting behavior and political engagement. Nationalistic ideologies tend to have firm categories and rules for what belongs to and represents the national culture. In a sample of 332 UK citizens, we tested whether strict categorization of stimuli and rules in objective cognitive tasks would be evident in strongly nationalistic individuals. Using voting behavior and attitudes from the United Kingdom's 2016 EU referendum, we found that a flexible representation of national identity and culture was linked to cognitive flexibility in the ideologically neutral Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Remote Associates Test, and to self-reported flexibility under uncertainty. Path analysis revealed that subjective and objective cognitive inflexibility predicted heightened authoritarianism, nationalism, conservatism, and system justification, and these in turn were predictive of support for Brexit and opposition to immigration, the European Union, and free movement of labor. This model accounted for 47.6% of the variance in support for Brexit. Path analysis models were also predictive of participants' sense of personal attachment to the United Kingdom, signifying that individual differences in cognitive flexibility may contribute toward ideological thinking styles that shape both nationalistic attitudes and personal sense of nationalistic identity. These findings further suggest that emotionally neutral "cold" cognitive information processing-and not just "hot" emotional cognition-may play a key role in ideological behavior and identity.

摘要

民族主义身份在公民的投票行为和政治参与中常常起着重要的作用。民族主义意识形态倾向于对属于和代表民族文化的事物进行严格的分类和规定。在一项对 332 名英国公民的抽样调查中,我们测试了在强烈的民族主义者中,客观认知任务中的严格分类和规则是否明显。通过对英国 2016 年欧盟公投的投票行为和态度进行研究,我们发现,对民族身份和文化的灵活表现与在意识形态中立的威斯康星卡片分类测试和远程联想测试中的认知灵活性有关,与在不确定情况下的自我报告灵活性有关。路径分析显示,主观和客观认知灵活性的降低预测了威权主义、民族主义、保守主义和制度正当化程度的增加,而这些因素反过来又预示着支持英国脱欧、反对移民、欧盟和劳动力自由流动。该模型解释了 47.6%的英国脱欧支持率的差异。路径分析模型也可以预测参与者对英国的个人依恋感,这表明认知灵活性的个体差异可能有助于形成塑造民族主义态度和个人民族主义身份感的意识形态思维方式。这些发现进一步表明,情感中立的“冷”认知信息处理——而不仅仅是“热”情感认知——可能在意识形态行为和身份认同中起着关键作用。

相似文献

1
Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 8;115(19):E4532-E4540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708960115. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: a data-driven approach.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200424. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0424. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Explaining voting in the UK's 2016 EU referendum: Values, attitudes to immigration, European identity and political trust.
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Nov;92:102476. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102476. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
4
The role of personality, authoritarianism and cognition in the United Kingdom's 2016 referendum on European Union membership.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1077354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077354. eCollection 2023.
6
Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism?
J Soc Psychol. 2005 Oct;145(5):571-92. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.145.5.571-592.
9
Immigration, political trust, and Brexit - Testing an aversion amplification hypothesis.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):310-326. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12233. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
An authoritarianism-compatible text changes British attitudes towards EU immigration.
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 12;15(1):31724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11491-z.
2
Mechanisms of mistrust: A Bayesian account of misinformation learning.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 May 14;21(5):e1012814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012814. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Cognitive ability and voting behaviour in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0289312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289312. eCollection 2023.
4
Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;20(1):115-141. doi: 10.1177/17456916231186409. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
(A)symmetries in Memory and Directed Forgetting of Political Stimuli.
Exp Psychol. 2023 Mar;70(2):68-80. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000581.
6
Does social rigidity predict cognitive rigidity? Profiles of socio-cognitive polarization.
Psychol Res. 2023 Nov;87(8):2533-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01832-w. Epub 2023 May 6.
7
A neuro-computational social learning framework to facilitate transdiagnostic classification and treatment across psychiatric disorders.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Jun;149:105181. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105181. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
8
The psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism.
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023;2(4):220-232. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00161-4. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
9
Not Getting Vaccinated? It Is a Matter of Problem-Solving Abilities and Socio-Cognitive Polarization.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031721.
10
Does social intolerance vary according to cognitive styles, genetic cognitive capacity, or education?
Brain Behav. 2022 Sep;12(9):e2704. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2704. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Oct;23:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
A watershed model of individual differences in fluid intelligence.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Oct;91:186-198. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
3
Ideological reactivity: Political conservatism and brain responsivity to emotional and neutral stimuli.
Emotion. 2016 Dec;16(8):1172-1185. doi: 10.1037/emo0000150. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
Zooming into creativity: individual differences in attentional global-local biases are linked to creative thinking.
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 30;6:1647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01647. eCollection 2015.
6
The tree to the left, the forest to the right: political attitude and perceptual bias.
Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:155-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
7
Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 16;111(50):17783-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416284111. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
8
Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology.
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):297-307. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001192.
10
The 12 item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS).
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e82131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082131. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验