Lalot Fanny, Abrams Dominic, Heering Maria S, Babaian Jacinta, Ozkececi Hilal, Peitz Linus, Davies Hayon Kaya, Broadwood Jo
University of Kent.
University of Basel.
Polit Psychol. 2022 Dec 14. doi: 10.1111/pops.12871.
We test the hypothesis that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is attributable to -an interactive combination of low concern and low trust. Across two studies, 9,695 respondents from different parts of Britain reported their level of concern about COVID-19, trust in the UK government, and intention to accept or refuse the vaccine. Multilevel regression analysis, controlling for geographic area and relevant demographics, confirmed the predicted interactive effect of concern and trust. Across studies, respondents with low trust and low concern were 10%-22% more vaccine hesitant than respondents with high trust or high concern, and 26%-29% more hesitant than respondents with high trust and high concern. Results hold equally among White, Black, and Muslim respondents, consistent with the view that regardless of mean-level differences, a common process underlies vaccine hesitancy, underlining the importance of tackling distrustful complacency both generally and specifically among unvaccinated individuals and populations.
我们检验了这样一个假设,即对新冠疫苗的犹豫归因于低关注度和低信任度的交互组合。在两项研究中,来自英国不同地区的9695名受访者报告了他们对新冠疫情的关注程度、对英国政府的信任度以及接受或拒绝接种疫苗的意愿。在控制了地理区域和相关人口统计学因素的多水平回归分析中,证实了关注度和信任度的预期交互作用。在各项研究中,低信任度和低关注度的受访者比高信任度或高关注度的受访者对疫苗的犹豫程度高10%-22%,比高信任度和高关注度的受访者高26%-29%。这些结果在白人、黑人和穆斯林受访者中同样成立,这与以下观点一致,即无论平均水平存在差异,一个共同的过程构成了疫苗犹豫的基础,强调了在总体上以及特别是在未接种疫苗的个人和人群中解决不信任自满情绪的重要性。