Crego Cristina, Oltmanns Joshua R, Widiger Thomas A
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jan;30(1):62-73. doi: 10.1037/pas0000495.
A series of 8 Five Factor Model Personality Disorder (FFMPD) scales have been developed to assess, from the perspective of the Five Factor Model (FFM), the maladaptive traits included within DSM-5 Section II personality disorders. An extensive body of FFMPD research has accumulated. However, for the most part, each study has been confined to the scales within 1 particular FFMPD Inventory. The current study considered 36 FFMPD scales, at least 1 from each of the 8 FFMPD inventories, including 8 scales considered to be from neuroticism, 8 from extraversion, 5 from openness, 8 from agreeableness, and 7 from conscientiousness. Their convergent, discriminant, and structural relationship with the FFM was considered, and compared with the structural relationship with the FFM obtained by the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and the Computerized Adaptive Test-Personality Disorder-Static Form (CAT-PD-SF). Support for an FFM structure was obtained (albeit with agreeableness defining 1 factor and antagonism a separate factor). Similarities and differences across the FFMPD, PID-5, and CAT-PD-SF scales were highlighted. (PsycINFO Database Record
已经开发了一系列8个五因素模型人格障碍（FFMPD）量表，以便从五因素模型（FFM）的角度评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版（DSM-5）第二部分人格障碍中包含的适应不良特质。大量的FFMPD研究已经积累起来。然而，在很大程度上，每项研究都局限于1个特定FFMPD量表中的量表。当前的研究考虑了36个FFMPD量表，每个8个FFMPD量表中至少有1个，包括8个被认为来自神经质的量表、8个来自外向性的量表、5个来自开放性的量表、8个来自宜人性的量表和7个来自尽责性的量表。研究考虑了它们与FFM的收敛、区分和结构关系，并与通过《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表（PID-5）和计算机化自适应测试-人格障碍-静态形式（CAT-PD-SF）获得的与FFM的结构关系进行了比较。获得了对FFM结构的支持（尽管宜人性定义了1个因素，敌对性定义了1个单独的因素）。突出了FFMPD、PID-5和CAT-PD-SF量表之间的异同。（《心理学文摘数据库记录》 ）
