• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Maladaptive Variants of Adaptive Traits and Bloated Specific Factors.适应性性状的适应不良变体与膨胀的特定因素。
J Res Pers. 2018 Oct;76:177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Five Factor Form and the Sliderbar Inventory.五因素形式和滑条框量表的聚合和区别效度。
Assessment. 2018 Mar;25(2):222-234. doi: 10.1177/1073191116643400. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
Obtaining and losing the bipolarity of the five-factor model through factor analysis.通过因子分析获得和失去五因素模型的两极性。
Personal Disord. 2020 Mar;11(2):119-130. doi: 10.1037/per0000378. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
4
A five-factor measure of dependent personality traits.依赖型人格特质的五因素测量。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):488-99. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.670681. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
5
Maladaptive variants of conscientiousness and agreeableness.不适应的尽责性和宜人性变体。
J Pers. 2012 Dec;80(6):1669-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00770.x.
6
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
7
The five-factor narcissism inventory: a five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits.五因素自恋人格量表:一种五因素测量自恋人格特质的工具。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):500-12. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.670680. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Self-pathology, the five-factor model, and bloated specific factors: A cautionary tale.自病性、五因素模型与膨胀的特质因素:一个警示故事。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Apr;125(3):423-34. doi: 10.1037/abn0000144. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Relations of five-factor model antagonism facets with personality disorder symptomatology.五因素模型对立性方面与人格障碍症状学的关系。
J Pers Assess. 1997 Oct;69(2):297-313. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6902_4.
10
Five Factor Model personality disorder scales: An introduction to a special section on assessment of maladaptive variants of the five factor model.五因素模型人格障碍量表:五因素模型适应不良变体评估专题介绍
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jan;30(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/pas0000523.

引用本文的文献

1
The Development and Validation of a Measure of Mental Health, Help-Seeking Beliefs in Arabic-Speaking Refugees.心理健康评估量表的制定与验证——以讲阿拉伯语的难民为例
Assessment. 2024 Oct;31(7):1359-1377. doi: 10.1177/10731911231220482. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
2
Application of the Rasch measurement model in rehabilitation research and practice: early developments, current practice, and future challenges.拉施测量模型在康复研究与实践中的应用:早期发展、当前实践及未来挑战。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jul 17;4:1208670. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1208670. eCollection 2023.
3
The Relationship Between Trait Emotional Intelligence and Personality. Is Trait EI Really Anchored Within the Big Five, Big Two and Big One Frameworks?特质情绪智力与人格之间的关系。特质情绪智力真的扎根于大五、大二和大一框架之中吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:866. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00866. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The bipolarity of normal and abnormal personality structure: Implications for assessment.正常和异常人格结构的两极性:对评估的启示。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Apr;31(4):420-431. doi: 10.1037/pas0000546. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
An Evaluation of Amazon's Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use.亚马逊土耳其机器人的评估、快速崛起及其有效应用。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):149-154. doi: 10.1177/1745691617706516.
3
Assessment of fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: Development and initial validation of the FLUX scales.浮夸型和脆弱型自恋波动评估:FLUX 量表的编制与初步验证。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Dec;30(12):1612-1624. doi: 10.1037/pas0000616. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
Aristotle's golden mean and the importance of bipolarity for personality models: A commentary on "Personality traits and maladaptivity: Unipolarity versus bipolarity".
J Pers. 2019 Dec;87(6):1097-1102. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12383. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
5
No evidence of a curvilinear relation between conscientiousness and relationship, work, and health outcomes.没有证据表明责任心与人际关系、工作和健康结果之间存在曲线关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Feb;116(2):296-312. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000176. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
6
FFMPD scales: Comparisons with the FFM, PID-5, and CAT-PD-SF.FFMPD量表:与FFM、PID-5和CAT-PD-SF的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jan;30(1):62-73. doi: 10.1037/pas0000495.
7
Five Factor Model personality disorder scales: An introduction to a special section on assessment of maladaptive variants of the five factor model.五因素模型人格障碍量表:五因素模型适应不良变体评估专题介绍
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jan;30(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/pas0000523.
8
Personality traits and maladaptivity: Unipolarity versus bipolarity.人格特质与适应不良:单相与双相。
J Pers. 2018 Oct;86(5):888-901. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12363. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Using online, crowdsourcing platforms for data collection in personality disorder research: The example of Amazon's Mechanical Turk.在人格障碍研究中利用在线众包平台进行数据收集:以亚马逊的土耳其机器人平台为例。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jan;8(1):26-34. doi: 10.1037/per0000191.
10
The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions.在网络上进行实验的陷阱:无人关注的选择性损耗如何导致令人惊讶(但错误)的研究结论。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Oct;111(4):493-504. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000056. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

适应性性状的适应不良变体与膨胀的特定因素。

Maladaptive Variants of Adaptive Traits and Bloated Specific Factors.

作者信息

Oltmanns Joshua R, Widiger Thomas A

机构信息

University of Kentucky.

出版信息

J Res Pers. 2018 Oct;76:177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.08.006
PMID:30906080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6428437/
Abstract

The five-factor model of personality disorder (FFMPD) hypothesizes that the traditionally adaptive five-factor model (FFM) poles (e.g., agreeableness) include maladaptive variants. However, "bloated specific factors" (BSFs), which are artifactual factors that emerge when a specific facet of a broader construct is over-represented, complicate research on the maladaptive variants. Twenty-five sets of factor analyses are completed herein demonstrating that items from maladaptive trait facet scales form BSFs when over-represented in factor analyses with other FFM indicators, separating from the higher-order domains in which they were originally located. These results held in 23 of 25 cases. Ensuring balanced collections of scales representing constructs would help researchers avoid BSFs. The implications of BSFs for future research on personality structure are discussed.

摘要

人格障碍五因素模型(FFMPD)假设,传统上具有适应性的五因素模型(FFM)两极(如宜人性)包含适应不良的变体。然而,“膨胀的特定因素”(BSFs)是当一个更广泛结构的特定方面被过度代表时出现的人为因素,这使对适应不良变体的研究变得复杂。本文完成了25组因素分析,结果表明,当适应不良特质层面量表的项目在与其他FFM指标的因素分析中被过度代表时,会形成BSFs,并与它们最初所属的高阶领域分离。25个案例中有23个案例的结果都是如此。确保代表结构的量表收集保持平衡,将有助于研究人员避免出现BSFs。本文还讨论了BSFs对未来人格结构研究的影响。