Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆治疗动物实验性皮肤伤口:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Platelet-rich plasma to treat experimentally-induced skin wounds in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tambella Adolfo Maria, Attili Anna Rita, Dupré Gilles, Cantalamessa Andrea, Martin Stefano, Cuteri Vincenzo, Marcazzan Sabrina, Del Fabbro Massimo

机构信息

School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, MC, Italy.

Clinic for Small Animal Surgery, Department for Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medicine University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0191093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191093. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to review current literature to determine whether the topical application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) promotes healing in experimentally-induced full-thickness skin wounds in animals. The hypothesis was that the adjunct of PRP has a positive effect on wound healing. An electronic search was carried out on the following databases: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Research Gate, Cochrane Wounds Group, Veterinary Information Network. No publication date nor language restrictions were applied. Randomised and not randomised controlled clinical trials comparing PRP with placebo or with other treatments were included. The reduction of open wound area in PRP-treated (test) wounds compared to control wounds was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were healing time and number of healed cases in test group compared to control. The following effect sizes were calculated: the Hedges' g for continuous variables; the odds ratio for binary data. Eighteen controlled clinical trials were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis, with a total of 661 wounds. All studies were published in the period 2007-2016. Eight studies were carried out on rodent/lagomorph mammals and 10 on non-rodent/lagomorph mammals. In all included studies, control wounds underwent placebo or were left untreated. The PRP group showed a better healing performance than the control group in each outcome. The effect size was statistically significant considering the primary outcome and the overall aggregation of the three outcomes. The effect size, although in favour of the treatment with PRP, was not significant considering the healing time and the number of healings. The overall heterogeneity was mild or moderate. Five studies reported a high risk of selection bias. The publication bias was always mild or absent. The results support the hypothesis of the positive effects of the PRP when compared to control groups in the treatment of experimentally-induced full-thickness skin wounds in animals. PRP can therefore be considered an effective adjunctive therapy in stimulating second intention healing of acute wounds in healthy animals.

摘要

本研究的目的是回顾当前文献,以确定富血小板血浆(PRP)局部应用是否能促进动物实验性全层皮肤伤口的愈合。假设是PRP辅助治疗对伤口愈合有积极作用。在以下数据库进行了电子检索:科学网、考克兰图书馆、PubMed、Research Gate、考克兰伤口组、兽医信息网络。未设出版日期和语言限制。纳入了比较PRP与安慰剂或其他治疗方法的随机和非随机对照临床试验。与对照伤口相比,PRP治疗(试验)伤口的开放伤口面积减少是主要结局。次要结局是试验组与对照组相比的愈合时间和愈合病例数。计算了以下效应量:连续变量的Hedges' g;二元数据的比值比。定性和定量综合分析纳入了18项对照临床试验,共661个伤口。所有研究均发表于2007年至2016年期间。8项研究在啮齿动物/兔形目哺乳动物上进行,10项在非啮齿动物/兔形目哺乳动物上进行。在所有纳入研究中,对照伤口接受安慰剂治疗或未治疗。在每个结局中,PRP组的愈合表现均优于对照组。考虑主要结局和三个结局的总体汇总,效应量具有统计学意义。考虑愈合时间和愈合数量时,效应量虽有利于PRP治疗,但无统计学意义。总体异质性为轻度或中度。5项研究报告存在高度选择偏倚风险。发表偏倚始终为轻度或不存在。结果支持了与对照组相比,PRP在治疗动物实验性全层皮肤伤口时具有积极作用的假设。因此,PRP可被视为刺激健康动物急性伤口二期愈合的有效辅助治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7ce/5764374/6eb4026d8129/pone.0191093.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验