Suppr超能文献

美国市售用于治疗膝骨关节炎疼痛的透明质酸产品的流变学特性

Rheological Properties of Commercially Available Hyaluronic Acid Products in the United States for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Knee Pain.

作者信息

Nicholls Mathew, Manjoo Ajay, Shaw Peter, Niazi Faizan, Rosen Jeffrey

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 3;11:1179544117751622. doi: 10.1177/1179544117751622. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The inconsistent results within the current literature regarding the efficacy of intra-articular-hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been suggested to be due to intrinsic differences between individual HA products. The purpose of this investigation is to define the rheological differences between currently available HA products in the United States at the time of this study for the treatment of knee OA, which will help elaborate on the appropriateness of classifying HA products as a class opposed to as individual agents.

METHODS

The rheological parameters for Euflexxa, Orthovisc, Supartz, Monovisc, Synvisc, Synvisc-One, Gel-One, and Hyalgan were obtained with a TA AR 2000 EX Rheometer with a cone-plate geometry (40-mm plate diameter and a 2° cone angle) at room temperature.

RESULTS

The bulk rheological parameters of the different products suggest molecular structures traversing the range of dilute solution (Hyalgan, Supartz), semidilute solution (Euflexxa, Orthovisc), entangled solutions (Monovisc, Synvisc, Synvisc-One), and even gel-like (Gel-One) behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the differences in rheological properties between IA-HA products, the universal assessment of these products as a class may not be appropriate. Instead, it may be more appropriate to assess each product individually. Future research should aim to link these differences in rheological properties to the differences in clinical efficacy seen across these IA-HA products.

摘要

目的

目前关于关节内注射透明质酸(IA-HA)治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)疗效的文献结果不一致,有人认为这是由于各个透明质酸产品之间存在内在差异。本研究的目的是确定在本研究开展之时美国市面上用于治疗膝骨关节炎的透明质酸产品之间的流变学差异,这将有助于阐明将透明质酸产品作为一个类别而非单个药物进行分类的合理性。

方法

使用配备锥板几何形状(平板直径40毫米,锥角2°)的TA AR 2000 EX流变仪在室温下获取Euflexxa、Orthovisc、Supartz、Monovisc、Synvisc、Synvisc-One、Gel-One和Hyalgan的流变学参数。

结果

不同产品的整体流变学参数表明其分子结构涵盖了稀溶液(Hyalgan、Supartz)、半稀溶液(Euflexxa、Orthovisc)、缠结溶液(Monovisc、Synvisc、Synvisc-One)甚至凝胶状(Gel-One)行为的范围。

结论

由于IA-HA产品之间流变学性质存在差异,将这些产品作为一个类别进行统一评估可能不合适。相反,对每个产品进行单独评估可能更合适。未来的研究应致力于将这些流变学性质的差异与这些IA-HA产品在临床疗效上的差异联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/138e/5757428/2f58c055984c/10.1177_1179544117751622-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验