Suppr超能文献

近期获批产品的信号检测:使用美国索赔和英国电子病历数据库对自我对照病例系列方法进行调整和评估。

Signal Detection for Recently Approved Products: Adapting and Evaluating Self-Controlled Case Series Method Using a US Claims and UK Electronic Medical Records Database.

机构信息

Epidemiology, Worldwide Safety and Regulatory, Pfizer Inc, 219 E. 42nd Street, Mail Stop 219/9/01, New York, NY, 10017, USA.

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2018 May;41(5):523-536. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0626-y.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Self-Controlled Case Series (SCCS) method has been widely used for hypothesis testing, but there is limited evidence of its performance for safety signal detection.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate SCCS for signal detection on recently approved products.

METHODS

A retrospective study covered the period after three recently marketed drugs were launched through to 31 December 2010 using The Health Improvement Network, a UK primary care database, and Optum, a US claims database. The SCCS method was applied to examine five heterogenous outcomes with desvenlafaxine and escitalopram and six outcomes with adalimumab for Signals of Disproportional Recording (SDRs); a positive finding was determined to be when the lower bound of 95% Confidence Interval of the incidence rate ratio (IRR) estimate was >  1. Multiple design choices were tested and the trend in IRR estimates over calendar time for one drug event pair was examined.

RESULTS

All six outcomes with adalimumab, three of five outcomes with desvenlafaxine, and four of five outcomes with escitalopram had SDRs. SCCS highlighted all acute events in the primary analysis but was less successful with slower-onset outcomes. Performance varied by risk period definition. Changes in IRR estimates over quarterly intervals for adalimumab with herpes zoster showed marked higher SDR within 9 months of drug launch.

CONCLUSION

SCCS shows promise for signal detection: it may highlight known associations for recent marketed products and has potential for early signal identification. SCCS performance varied by design choice and the nature of both exposure and event pair. Future work is needed to determine how effective the approach is in prospective testing and determining the performance characteristics of the approach.

摘要

简介

自我对照病例系列(SCCS)方法已被广泛应用于假设检验,但关于其在安全性信号检测中的性能的证据有限。

目的

本研究旨在评估 SCCS 对最近批准产品的信号检测能力。

方法

本回顾性研究涵盖了自三种最近上市药物推出至 2010 年 12 月 31 日期间的数据,使用了英国初级保健数据库 The Health Improvement Network 和美国索赔数据库 Optum。应用 SCCS 方法检查了去甲文拉法辛和依地普仑的五个异质结局以及阿达木单抗的六个结局,以检测信号的不协调性记录(SDR);当 95%置信区间(CI)下限的发生率比(IRR)估计值>1 时,确定为阳性结果。测试了多种设计选择,并检查了一种药物事件对的 IRR 估计值随日历时间的趋势。

结果

阿达木单抗的六个结局、去甲文拉法辛的五个结局中的三个以及依地普仑的五个结局中的四个均出现了 SDR。SCCS 在主要分析中突出了所有急性事件,但对于发病较慢的结局则不太成功。性能因风险期定义而异。阿达木单抗的疱疹性疾病在季度间隔内的 IRR 估计值变化显示,在药物推出后 9 个月内,SDR 明显升高。

结论

SCCS 显示出信号检测的潜力:它可能突出了最近上市产品的已知关联,并且具有早期信号识别的潜力。SCCS 的性能因设计选择以及暴露和事件对的性质而异。需要进一步的工作来确定该方法在前瞻性测试中的有效性,并确定该方法的性能特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验