• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂干预措施的荟萃分析。

Meta-Analysis of Complex Interventions.

机构信息

Peabody Research Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.

Current affiliation: Department of Counseling Psychology and Human Services, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1215, USA; email:

出版信息

Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:135-151. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014112. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014112
PMID:29328876
Abstract

Meta-analysis is a prominent method for estimating the effects of public health interventions, yet these interventions are often complex in ways that pose challenges to using conventional meta-analytic methods. This article discusses meta-analytic techniques that can be used in research syntheses on the effects of complex public health interventions. We first introduce the use of complexity frameworks to conceptualize public health interventions. We then present a menu of meta-analytic procedures for addressing various sources of complexity when answering questions about the effects of public health interventions in research syntheses. We conclude with a review of important practices and key resources for conducting meta-analyses on complex interventions, as well as future directions for research synthesis more generally. Overall, we argue that it is possible to conduct meaningful quantitative syntheses of research on the effects of public health interventions, though these meta-analyses may require the use of advanced techniques to properly consider and attend to issues of complexity.

摘要

元分析是一种估算公共卫生干预措施效果的重要方法,但这些干预措施通常很复杂,给使用传统元分析方法带来了挑战。本文讨论了可用于复杂公共卫生干预措施效果研究综合评价的元分析技术。我们首先介绍了使用复杂性框架来概念化公共卫生干预措施。然后,我们提出了一套元分析程序,用于在研究综合评价中回答有关公共卫生干预措施效果的问题时,解决各种来源的复杂性。最后,我们回顾了进行复杂干预措施元分析的重要实践和关键资源,以及更广泛的研究综合的未来方向。总的来说,我们认为可以对公共卫生干预措施效果的研究进行有意义的定量综合,但这些元分析可能需要使用先进的技术来正确考虑和处理复杂性问题。

相似文献

1
Meta-Analysis of Complex Interventions.复杂干预措施的荟萃分析。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:135-151. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014112. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.知识综合方法在农业食品公共卫生中的应用:最新进展、挑战与机遇。
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1;113(4):339-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
3
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 5: advanced analytic methods.美国医疗保健研究与质量局复杂干预系统评价系列论文5:高级分析方法
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
4
Sufficiency and stability of evidence for public health interventions using cumulative meta-analysis.使用累积荟萃分析的公共卫生干预措施证据的充分性和稳定性。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):515-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.036343. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
5
Emergent approaches to the meta-analysis of multiple heterogeneous complex interventions.针对多种异质性复杂干预措施的荟萃分析的紧急方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jun 2;15:47. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0040-z.
6
An exploration of synthesis methods in public health evaluations of interventions concludes that the use of modern statistical methods would be beneficial.一项关于干预措施的公共卫生评估中的综合方法的研究得出结论,使用现代统计方法将是有益的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):376-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
7
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 3: adapting frameworks to develop protocols.医疗保健研究与质量机构关于复杂干预系统评价的系列文章——第3篇:调整框架以制定方案
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
8
The meta-analytic approach to research integration.研究整合的元分析方法。
Can J Nurs Res. 1996 Fall;28(3):69-85.
9
Comparison of registered and published intervention fidelity assessment in cluster randomised trials of public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review protocol.低收入和中等收入国家公共卫生干预措施整群随机试验中注册与发表的干预保真度评估比较:系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 19;5(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0351-0.
10
Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 10: synthesizing evidence for effects collected from quasi-experimental studies presents surmountable challenges.准实验研究设计系列论文10:综合从准实验研究中收集的效应证据存在可克服的挑战。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Sensory Integration Influence Gait Parameters in Healthy Older Adults? Insights from a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.感觉统合是否会影响健康老年人的步态参数?一项系统评价与荟萃分析的见解。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 26;14(13):4545. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134545.
2
Co-developing a theory of change for a personalised multimodal cancer prehabilitation programme in South Wales.共同为南威尔士的个性化多模式癌症术前康复计划制定变革理论。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):1525. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11964-3.
3
The therapeutic potential of traditional Chinese medicine in depression: focused on the modulation of neuroplasticity.
中药在抑郁症中的治疗潜力:聚焦于神经可塑性的调节
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 26;15:1426769. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1426769. eCollection 2024.
4
A review of strategies and levels of community engagement in strengths-based and needs-based health communication interventions.基于优势和基于需求的健康传播干预中社区参与的策略及程度综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 9;12:1231827. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1231827. eCollection 2024.
5
Scope, Characteristics, Behavior Change Techniques, and Quality of Conversational Agents for Mental Health and Well-Being: Systematic Assessment of Apps.用于心理健康和福祉的对话代理的范围、特征、行为改变技术和质量:应用程序的系统评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 18;25:e45984. doi: 10.2196/45984.
6
PROTOCOL: Involving men and boys in family planning: A systematic review of the effective components and characteristics of complex interventions in low- and middle-income countries.方案:让男性参与计划生育:对低收入和中等收入国家复杂干预措施的有效组成部分和特征进行的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 19;17(1):e1140. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1140. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Involving men and boys in family planning: A systematic review of the effective components and characteristics of complex interventions in low- and middle-income countries.让男性参与计划生育:对低收入和中等收入国家复杂干预措施的有效组成部分和特征的系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 13;19(1):e1296. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1296. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Intervention Programs Targeting the Mental Health, Professional Burnout, and/or Wellbeing of School Teachers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.针对学校教师心理健康、职业倦怠和/或幸福感的干预项目:系统评价与荟萃分析
Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09720-w. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
9
Effectiveness of Infection Control Teams in Reducing Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.感染控制团队在降低医疗机构相关性感染中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17075. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417075.
10
Reported Outcomes in Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials.多学科疼痛治疗的报告结果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析概述
J Pain Res. 2022 Aug 30;15:2557-2576. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S362913. eCollection 2022.