• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PROTOCOL: Involving men and boys in family planning: A systematic review of the effective components and characteristics of complex interventions in low- and middle-income countries.

作者信息

Aventin Áine, Robinson Martin, Hanratty Jennifer, Ruane-McAteer Eimear, Tomlinson Mark, Clarke Mike, Okonofua Friday, Bonell Chris, Lohan Maria

机构信息

Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK.

University College Cork Cork Ireland.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 19;17(1):e1140. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1140. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/cl2.1140
PMID:37050964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8356317/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e970/8356317/600bcc5d83df/CL2-17-e1140-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e970/8356317/600bcc5d83df/CL2-17-e1140-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e970/8356317/600bcc5d83df/CL2-17-e1140-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
PROTOCOL: Involving men and boys in family planning: A systematic review of the effective components and characteristics of complex interventions in low- and middle-income countries.方案：让男性参与计划生育：对低收入和中等收入国家复杂干预措施的有效组成部分和特征进行的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 19;17(1):e1140. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1140. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Involving men and boys in family planning: A systematic review of the effective components and characteristics of complex interventions in low- and middle-income countries.让男性参与计划生育：对低收入和中等收入国家复杂干预措施的有效组成部分和特征的系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 13;19(1):e1296. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1296. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Nothing so practical as theory: a rapid review of the use of behaviour change theory in family planning interventions involving men and boys.没有什么比理论更实际的了：快速综述在涉及男性和男孩的计划生育干预中使用行为改变理论的情况。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jun 13;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01173-0.
4
Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews.社会保护对低收入和中等收入国家性别平等的影响：一项综述的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 May 25;18(2):e1240. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1240. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: an evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews.性与生殖健康及权利领域中针对男性、男性气质与性别平等的干预措施：证据与差距图谱及综述的系统评价
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 11;4(5):e001634. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001634. eCollection 2019.
6
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Educational Interventions in Family Planning for Men in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review.评估发展中国家男性计划生育教育干预措施的有效性：一项系统综述。
JMA J. 2024 Jan 15;7(1):40-51. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0018. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
7
Systematic review of reviews on interventions to engage men and boys as clients, partners and agents of change for improved sexual and reproductive health and rights.关于促使男性和男孩成为改善性健康和生殖健康及权利的服务对象、伙伴和变革推动者的干预措施的综述之系统评价
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e083950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083950.
8
Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Improving Contraceptive Use in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.移动健康干预措施在改善中低收入国家避孕措施使用方面的效果：系统评价。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Dec 23;8(4):813-826. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00069.
9
Targeted faith-based and faith-placed interventions for noncommunicable disease prevention and control in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.以信仰为基础和以信仰为导向的干预措施在中低收入国家预防和控制非传染性疾病的系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 11;11(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01981-w.
10
A systematic review of public health interventions to address breast cancer inequalities in low- and middle-income countries.系统评价公共卫生干预措施在解决中低收入国家乳腺癌不平等问题中的作用。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 25;13(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02620-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Male Involvement in Family Planning Decisions in Malawi and Tanzania: What Are the Determinants?马拉维和坦桑尼亚的男性在计划生育决策中的参与情况：有哪些决定因素？
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;20(6):5053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065053.
2
Involving men and boys in family planning: A systematic review of the effective components and characteristics of complex interventions in low- and middle-income countries.让男性参与计划生育：对低收入和中等收入国家复杂干预措施的有效组成部分和特征的系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 13;19(1):e1296. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1296. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
A comparative study of postnatal depression and associated factors in Gauteng and Free State provinces, South Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol for a systematic review: Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health: An evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews.系统评价方案：针对性别平等、男性及男性气质在性与生殖健康方面的干预措施：证据与差距图谱及综述的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 31;14(1):1-24. doi: 10.1002/CL2.203. eCollection 2018.
2
Nothing so practical as theory: a rapid review of the use of behaviour change theory in family planning interventions involving men and boys.没有什么比理论更实际的了：快速综述在涉及男性和男孩的计划生育干预中使用行为改变理论的情况。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jun 13;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01173-0.
3
南非豪登省和自由州省产后抑郁症及相关因素的比较研究。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2022 Sep 30;14(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3031.
4
Nothing so practical as theory: a rapid review of the use of behaviour change theory in family planning interventions involving men and boys.没有什么比理论更实际的了：快速综述在涉及男性和男孩的计划生育干预中使用行为改变理论的情况。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jun 13;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01173-0.
Gender-transformative programming with men and boys to improve sexual and reproductive health and rights: a systematic review of intervention studies.
促进男性性别转变的项目对改善性健康和生殖健康及权利的影响：干预研究的系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002997.
4
Gender-transformative programmes: implications for research and action.性别变革型项目：对研究与行动的影响
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e159-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30528-5. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Male Participation in Reproductive Health Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区男性参与生殖健康干预措施：范围综述。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Dec 17;45:71-85. doi: 10.1363/45e8119.
6
Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: an evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews.性与生殖健康及权利领域中针对男性、男性气质与性别平等的干预措施：证据与差距图谱及综述的系统评价
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 11;4(5):e001634. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001634. eCollection 2019.
7
Meta-Analysis of Complex Interventions.复杂干预措施的荟萃分析。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:135-151. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014112. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preconception lifestyle interventions on fertility, obstetric, fetal, anthropometric and metabolic outcomes in men and women.系统评价和荟萃分析孕前生活方式干预对男性和女性生育力、产科、胎儿、人体测量和代谢结局的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;32(9):1925-1940. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex241.
9
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.运用行为改变理论领域框架调查实施问题指南。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
10
Are men well served by family planning programs?计划生育项目对男性有益吗？
Reprod Health. 2017 Jan 23;14(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5.