Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Mar;72(3):185-192. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209984. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Several studies have analysed the characteristics of multimorbidity patterns but none have evaluated the relationship with survival. The purpose of this study was to compare survival across older adults with different chronic multimorbidity patterns (CMPs).
Prospective longitudinal observational study using electronic health records for 190 108 people aged ≥65 years in Barcelona, Spain (2009-2014). CMPs were identified by cluster analysis. Mortality rates were estimated using the Catalan population structure and individual time at risk. Survival according to CMP (Cox regression) was analysed using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with stratification by sex and age group (65-79, 80-94) and adjustment for age at onset, deprivation index, number of chronic conditions and invoiced drugs.
The highest mortality rates were observed in men, adults aged 80-94 years, socially disadvantaged quintiles and people prescribed more drugs and with fewer conditions. Using the musculoskeletal pattern as the reference category, men with the digestive-respiratory pattern had a higher risk of death, with adjusted HRs of 6.16 (95% CI 5.37 to 7.06) in the 65-79 age group and 2.62 (95% CI 2.31 to 2.97) in the 80-94 age group. In women, the cardiovascular pattern was associated with the highest risk, with adjusted HRs of 6.34 (95% CI 5.28 to 7.61) in the 65-79 age group and 3.05 (95% CI 2.73 to 3.41) in the 80-94 age group. These patterns were also associated with the highest mortality rates.
Mortality and survival vary according to CMPs in older adults stratified by sex and age. Our findings are useful for guiding the design and implementation of clinical management strategies.
已有多项研究分析了多种合并症模式的特征,但均未评估其与生存率的关系。本研究旨在比较不同慢性合并症模式(CMP)的老年患者的生存率。
本研究为前瞻性纵向观察性研究,使用西班牙巴塞罗那的电子健康记录,纳入 190108 名年龄≥65 岁的人群(2009-2014 年)。采用聚类分析确定 CMP。使用加泰罗尼亚人口结构和个体风险时间计算死亡率。使用 Cox 回归分析 CMP 下的生存率(风险比 [HR]和 95%置信区间 [CI]),并按性别和年龄组(65-79 岁、80-94 岁)分层,调整发病年龄、贫困指数、慢性疾病数量和开处方药物进行分析。
男性、80-94 岁的成年人、社会弱势群体五分位数以及服用更多药物和患有更少疾病的人群的死亡率最高。以肌肉骨骼模式为参考类别,与消化系统-呼吸系统模式相比,65-79 岁年龄组男性死亡风险更高,调整后的 HR 为 6.16(95%CI 5.37-7.06),80-94 岁年龄组的 HR 为 2.62(95%CI 2.31-2.97)。对于女性,心血管模式与最高的风险相关,65-79 岁年龄组的调整后的 HR 为 6.34(95%CI 5.28-7.61),80-94 岁年龄组的 HR 为 3.05(95%CI 2.73-3.41)。这些模式也与最高的死亡率相关。
按性别和年龄分层的老年患者的死亡率和生存率因 CMP 而异。我们的研究结果有助于指导临床管理策略的设计和实施。