Suppr超能文献

在荆棘丛中看到玫瑰:性侵犯幸存者对社会反应的认知

Seeing Roses in the Thorn Bush: Sexual Assault Survivors' Perceptions of Social Reactions.

作者信息

Dworkin Emily R, Newton Emily, Allen Nicole E

机构信息

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

Psychol Violence. 2018;8(1):100-109. doi: 10.1037/vio0000082.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

After sexual assault, survivors often reach to others for support and receive a range of reactions. Although these reactions have been characterized by researchers as positive (e.g., emotional support) or negative (e.g., victim blaming), survivors vary in their perceptions in ways that do not always match this framework. The goal of this research was to examine the degree to which designations of reactions as "positive" or "negative" fits across types of reactions and explain instances of mismatch between these designations and survivors' perceptions.

METHOD

We conducted a qualitative analysis of interviews with 26 survivors of sexual assault to identify themes in their perceptions of social reactions.

RESULTS

Although social reactions were generally perceived in a manner that matched researcher categorizations, there was significant variation. Perceptions could be characterized in terms of whether the reaction felt comfortable/soothing, consistent with survivors' needs/hopes/expectations, and helpful in the long term. The closeness of survivors' relationships with responders, the degree to which they were impacted by the assault, and the presence of other social reactions explained variation from researcher designations of reaction types.

CONCLUSION

This study clarifies the considerations that survivors make when evaluating social reactions and what accounts for discrepant perceptions of these reactions; in particular, they highlight that there is no "one size fits all" reaction to survivors of sexual assault and the context in which reactions occur may affect how they are seen.

摘要

目的

遭受性侵犯后,幸存者常常向他人寻求支持并得到一系列反应。尽管研究人员将这些反应描述为积极的(如情感支持)或消极的(如指责受害者),但幸存者对这些反应的认知各不相同,并不总是符合这一框架。本研究的目的是检验将反应指定为“积极”或“消极”在不同类型反应中的适用程度,并解释这些指定与幸存者认知之间的不匹配情况。

方法

我们对26名性侵犯幸存者的访谈进行了定性分析,以确定他们对社会反应认知中的主题。

结果

尽管社会反应的总体认知方式与研究人员的分类相符,但仍存在显著差异。认知可以根据反应是否让人感觉舒适/舒缓、是否符合幸存者的需求/希望/期望以及从长远来看是否有帮助来进行描述。幸存者与反应者关系的亲密度、他们受袭击的影响程度以及其他社会反应的存在解释了与研究人员对反应类型的指定存在差异的原因。

结论

本研究阐明了幸存者在评估社会反应时的考虑因素以及对这些反应认知存在差异的原因;特别是,研究强调对于性侵犯幸存者不存在“一刀切”的反应方式,反应发生的背景可能会影响人们对这些反应的看法。

相似文献

1
Seeing Roses in the Thorn Bush: Sexual Assault Survivors' Perceptions of Social Reactions.
Psychol Violence. 2018;8(1):100-109. doi: 10.1037/vio0000082.
2
Are Survivors of Sexual Assault Blamed More Than Victims of Other Crimes?
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Oct;37(19-20):NP18394-NP18416. doi: 10.1177/08862605211037423. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
A Dyadic Study of Impacts of Sexual Assault Disclosure on Survivors' Informal Support Relationships.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):NP5033-NP5059. doi: 10.1177/0886260518795506. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
4
Social Reactions to Disclosures of Multiple-Perpetrator Sexual Assault: Do Number of Offenders Matter?
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Jan;40(1-2):56-78. doi: 10.1177/08862605241245378. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
6
Social Reactions, Self-Blame and Problem Drinking in Adult Sexual Assault Survivors.
Psychol Violence. 2015 Apr;5(2):192-198. doi: 10.1037/a0036316.
7
Rape as an Economic Crime: The Impact of Sexual Violence on Survivors' Employment and Economic Well-Being.
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Oct;30(16):2793-813. doi: 10.1177/0886260514554291. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
Sexual Assault Survivors' Experiences with Mental Health Professionals: A Qualitative Study.
Women Ther. 2017;40(1-2):228-246. doi: 10.1080/02703149.2016.1213609. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
10
Correlates of Disclosure Cessation After Sexual Assault.
Violence Against Women. 2018 Jan;24(1):85-100. doi: 10.1177/1077801216675743. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations Among Online Social Reactions to Disclosure of Sexual Victimization, Coping and Social Isolation.
J Child Sex Abus. 2024 Feb;33(2):146-168. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2024.2314287. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
2
The Process of Online Disclosures of Interpersonal Victimization: A Systematic Review.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jul;25(3):2028-2045. doi: 10.1177/15248380231204886. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Social Network Changes and Disclosure Responses after Sexual Assault.
Psychol Women Q. 2022 Sep;46(3):299-315. doi: 10.1177/03616843221085213. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Disclosure of Sexual Victimization: Effects of Invalidation and Shame on Re-Disclosure.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8332-8356. doi: 10.1177/08862605231155122. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Social network responses to victims of potentially traumatic events: A systematic review using qualitative evidence synthesis.
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276476. eCollection 2022.
7
Unfounded Sexual Assault: Women's Experiences of Not Being Believed by the Police.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP8916-NP8940. doi: 10.1177/0886260520978190. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Social reactions to disclosure of interpersonal violence and psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;72:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101750. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
10
Alcohol's Role in Social Reactions to Sexual Assault Disclosures: A Qualitative Study of Informal Support Dyads.
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):5365-5389. doi: 10.1177/0886260517721172. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验