Miller A B
a Dalla Lana School of Public Health , University of Toronto , Toronto , ON , Canada.
Climacteric. 2018 Jun;21(3):204-208. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1392503. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
The evidence is reviewed on the efficacy and effectiveness of mammography screening derived from randomized screening trials and from the surveillance of populations where mammography screening for breast cancer has been introduced. Nearly all the trials were performed in the era before modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer was introduced, apart from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study and the UK Age trial. The former found no benefit from annual mammography screening for 5 years in women age 40-59 years, the latter, a non-significant benefit from screening women by annual mammography for 7 years from ages 39 to 41 years. The evidence from population-based surveillance is mixed, most such studies having failed to consider the benefit gained from improved therapy. It is concluded that we have reached the point of negligible benefit from mammography screening for breast cancer in women at average risk, and that we should concentrate on early diagnosis of breast cancer and the application of modern therapy according to clearly defined sub-types of breast cancer.
本文回顾了来自随机筛查试验以及引入乳腺癌钼靶筛查的人群监测的钼靶筛查有效性和效果的证据。除了加拿大国家乳腺筛查研究和英国年龄试验外,几乎所有试验都是在引入现代乳腺癌辅助治疗之前的时代进行的。前者发现,40至59岁女性每年进行5年钼靶筛查没有益处,后者发现,39至41岁女性每年进行7年钼靶筛查有不显著的益处。基于人群监测的证据不一,大多数此类研究未能考虑到改善治疗所带来的益处。得出的结论是,对于平均风险的女性,钼靶筛查对乳腺癌的益处已微乎其微,我们应专注于乳腺癌的早期诊断以及根据明确界定的乳腺癌亚型应用现代治疗方法。