Owsley Cynthia, Clark Mark E, Huisingh Carrie E, Curcio Christine A, McGwin Gerald
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States 2Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Apr;57(4):1782-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18962.
In older eyes in normal macular health, we examined associations between impaired photopic acuity, mesopic acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity, light sensitivity, and the presence of low luminance deficit (difference between photopic and mesopic acuity) at baseline and incident AMD 3 years later. Associations were compared with an association between delayed rod-mediated dark adaptation and incident AMD, previously reported for this cohort.
Enrollees were 60 years or older. Eyes at step 1 in the AREDS nine-step classification system based on masked grading of color fundus photographs were included. Photopic and mesopic acuity, contrast sensitivity, and light sensitivity, and the presence of low luminance deficit, were measured at baseline. Demographic, lifestyle, general health, and blood markers were assessed at baseline as potential confounders. Three years later fundus grading was repeated to determine AMD presence.
For the analysis, 827 eyes of 467 persons were eligible. Impaired mesopic acuity at baseline was associated with incident AMD, age-adjusted rate ratio (RR) 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.35), whereas impaired photopic acuity, contrast sensitivity and macular light sensitivity, and the presence of a low luminance deficit were not. The mesopic acuity association was slightly weaker than the association between abnormal dark adaptation and incident AMD (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.07-3.20).
Impaired mesopic acuity in eyes in normal macular health is a risk factor for incident early AMD 3 years later, however, photopic acuity, contrast sensitivity, and light sensitivity, and the presence of a low luminance deficit are not risk factors.
在黄斑健康正常的老年眼中,我们研究了基线时明视视力、中间视觉视力、空间对比敏感度、光敏感度以及低亮度缺陷(明视和中间视觉视力之间的差异)与3年后发生年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)之间的关联。将这些关联与先前报道的该队列中杆介导的暗适应延迟与发生AMD之间的关联进行比较。
参与者年龄在60岁及以上。纳入基于彩色眼底照片的蒙面分级在年龄相关性眼病研究(AREDS)九步分类系统中处于第1步的眼睛。在基线时测量明视和中间视觉视力、对比敏感度、光敏感度以及低亮度缺陷的存在情况。在基线时评估人口统计学、生活方式、总体健康状况和血液标志物作为潜在混杂因素。3年后重复眼底分级以确定是否存在AMD。
分析中,467人的827只眼睛符合条件。基线时中间视觉视力受损与发生AMD相关,年龄调整后的率比(RR)为1.57(95%置信区间[CI]为1.04 - 2.35),而明视视力受损、对比敏感度和黄斑光敏感度以及低亮度缺陷的存在则无此关联。中间视觉视力的关联略弱于异常暗适应与发生AMD之间的关联(RR为1.85,95%CI为1.07 - 3.20)。
黄斑健康正常的眼睛中中间视觉视力受损是3年后发生早期AMD的危险因素,然而,明视视力、对比敏感度、光敏感度以及低亮度缺陷的存在并非危险因素。