Owsley Cynthia, Huisingh Carrie, Clark Mark E, Jackson Gregory R, McGwin Gerald
a Department of Ophthalmology , School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , AL , USA .
b MacuLogix Inc. , Hummelstown , PA , USA , and.
Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(2):266-72. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1011282. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
To compare the ability of several visual functional tests in terms of the strength of their associations with the earliest phases of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which bears on their potential to serve as functional endpoints in evaluating treatments for early AMD and prevention strategies.
Eyes from adults ≥60 years old were identified as being in normal macular health or in the earliest stages of AMD (steps 2, 3 or 4) through grading of color stereo-fundus photos by an experienced grader masked to all other study variables who used the 9-step Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) classification system for AMD severity. Visual function was assessed using the following tests: best-corrected visual acuity, low luminance visual acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity, macular cone-mediated light sensitivity and rod-mediated dark adaptation.
A total of 1260 eyes were tested from 640 participants; 1007 eyes were in normal macular health (defined as step 1 in AREDS system) and 253 eyes had early AMD (defined as steps 2, 3 or 4). Adjusting for age and gender, early AMD eyes had two times the odds of having delayed rod-mediated dark adaptation than eyes in normal macular health (p = 0.0019). Visual acuity, low luminance acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity and macular light sensitivity did not differ between normal eyes and early AMD eyes.
Eyes in the earliest phases of AMD were two times more likely to have delayed rod-mediated dark adaptation, as assessed by the rod-intercept, as compared to older eyes in normal macular health, whereas there was no difference in early AMD versus normal eyes in tests of visual acuity, low luminance acuity, macular light sensitivity and spatial contrast sensitivity.
比较几种视觉功能测试与年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)最早阶段的关联强度,这关系到它们作为评估早期AMD治疗和预防策略的功能终点的潜力。
通过一位对所有其他研究变量不知情的经验丰富的分级人员,使用9步年龄相关性眼病研究(AREDS)AMD严重程度分类系统对彩色立体眼底照片进行分级,将60岁及以上成年人的眼睛确定为黄斑健康正常或处于AMD的最早阶段(步骤2、3或4)。使用以下测试评估视觉功能:最佳矫正视力、低亮度视力、空间对比敏感度、黄斑视锥介导的光敏感度和视杆介导的暗适应。
共对640名参与者的1260只眼睛进行了测试;1007只眼睛黄斑健康正常(在AREDS系统中定义为步骤1),253只眼睛患有早期AMD(定义为步骤2、3或4)。在调整年龄和性别后,患有早期AMD的眼睛出现视杆介导的暗适应延迟的几率是黄斑健康正常眼睛的两倍(p = 0.0019)。正常眼睛和早期AMD眼睛在视力、低亮度视力、空间对比敏感度和黄斑光敏感度方面没有差异。
与黄斑健康正常的老年眼睛相比,通过视杆截距评估,处于AMD最早阶段的眼睛出现视杆介导的暗适应延迟的可能性高出两倍,而在视力、低亮度视力、黄斑光敏感度和空间对比敏感度测试中,早期AMD眼睛与正常眼睛没有差异。